FreedomAdvocate @ FreedomAdvocate @lemmy.net.au

Oh hi there *person who I've upset by expressing my opinion who is now want

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

1,244

Joined

3 mo. ago

Are you taking that as me saying that they "learn in the same way" as in......by using their eyes to see it and ears to listen to it? You seem to be reading waaaaay too much into a simple sentence. AI "learns" by consuming the content. People learn by consuming the content.

It applies based on similarity whether you mention the original author or not.

That's if you're recreating something. Writing fan-fiction isn't a violation of copyright.

Not at all true. AI doesn’t just reproduce content it was trained on on demand.

Your very first statement calling my basis for my argument incorrect is incorrect lol.

LLMs “learn” things from the content they consume. They don’t just take the content in wholesale and keep it there to regurgitate on command.

On your last part, unless someone uses AI to recreate the tone etc of a best selling author and then markets their book/writing as being from said best selling author, and doesn’t use trademarked characters etc, there’s no issue. You can’t copyright a style of writing.

You can “use” them to learn from, just like “AI” can.

What exactly do you think AI does when it “learns” from a book, for example? Do you think it will just spit out the entire book if you ask it to?

Makes sense. AI can “learn” from and “read” a book in the same way a person can and does, as long as it is acquired legally. AI doesn’t reproduce a work that it “learns” from, so why would it be illegal?

Some people just see “AI” and want everything about it outlawed basically. If you put some information out into the public, you don’t get to decide who does and doesn’t consume and learn from it. If a machine can replicate your writing style because it could identify certain patterns, words, sentence structure, etc then as long as it’s not pretending to create things attributed to you, there’s no issue.

Six of Trump’s cabinet secretaries authored or contributed to Project 2025.

That doesn't mean that Project 2025 is being followed. It's not. It's not Trumps plan.

Your claim wasn't that those 6 people contributed to Project 2025, it's that Project 2025 was this governments plan.

That's basically subdividing, and no you can't just do that to your hearts content. You need to get council etc sign off, new plots drawn up, etc.

Reddit does IP bans and device fingerprinting for site-wide permabans. When they banned my main account - after I deleted all my comments/posts and then deleted my account mind you, they then undeleted it all so they could ban it - within an hour of signing in to an alt account that had never made a post/comment/upvote/etc, it was also permanently banned.

It's not hard to get around these restrictions and use reddit if you do want to, but I don't want to.

Not unless you can prove that it was you that was watching those videos, no.

You didn't prove anything lol. You linked to a far-left biased site.

You’ve been patient? 🤣

Bye

Unfortunately with RAID you need to basically wipe and start again to add more drives to the array.

Borders? California? They don’t care about borders lol

Hiring someone over someone else purely because of their race or sex is discrimination, racism, and/or sexism.

It sounds to me like you’re talking about jobs that illegal immigrants do, especially once you brought up cheap labor. Jobs like those don’t have diversity quotas, because they almost entirely hire from the “diversity” pool.

A liar accusing someone else of being a liar, amazing.

How many of those Saturn V rockets landed themselves back on the launch pad?

NASAs milestones were not the same as, nor anywhere near as hard as, SpaceX’s.

Your incompetence line shows you’re not capable of being impartial in this so there’s no real point continuing. You’re saying the guy responsible for the EV market we have no, the almost fully self driving cars we have now, the satellite internet network we have now, and the reusable spaceship booster rockets we have now is “incompetent”. You’re not here to actually have a discussion.

Mate honestly you’ve been talking jibber jabber “I am so smart” type waffle in every single post. You still haven’t given actual examples of what you’re talking about, what it would look like, or how it would be done.

I’ll give you one more reply and if you post yet another hundred words that say nothing, I’m out. What would this magical all data encompassing product look like to you? How would it work?

Iran getting nuclear weapons means the USA is very much involved - not by their own choice - no matter what you might think, because Iran has been extremely “death to the USA” for the longest time. Why do you think they’re trying to make nukes?

The USA, as the global military super power, is the de facto “peace keeper through military might” when it comes to countries escalating like this (by building nuclear weapons).

It’s definitely ok. You’re not owed the ability to play every single game that releases on your hardware. Should PS2 owners still be getting every 2025 game released on the PS2, with no games allowed to be built with capabilities requiring better hardware than the PS2?

Thankfully some devs are now moving with the times and giving us games built on modern technology, like doom the dark ages and Indiana jones.

Did you just wake up from a coma or something? Have you not been awake the last few weeks to see what has been going on with Israel and Iran?