FourPacketsOfPeanuts @ FourPacketsOfPeanuts @lemmy.world

Posts

8

Comments

992

Joined

2 yr. ago

The OT for sure. The NT is different, there's decent evidence the NT was substantially completed in the first century with minor edits in the second. (Wholesale rewrites in the first century totally on the table, though unlikely)

As a secular scholar I'd point to the lack of substantive differences between the versions used by the widely dispersed church fathers in the early second century, their preoccupation with pointing out error, and their lack of having to tackle massive differences in the text when they tackled lots of other problems and heresies

Evo moment 37

Yes most certainly. Also the runway was undergoing maintenance which shortened it by about 10% at the other end. They claimed it had no impact on the disaster, but I can see a pilot coming in under duress and perhaps little control giving too much clearance to the maintenance work at the near end and ending up touching down far too far along the runway

Are you talking about an asymptote? Things "in the limit" is maths voodoo whenever infinity is involved

It just gets weirder doesn't it

Boeing 737 allows for gravity drop of landing gear which would work even with total power loss

https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/79782/can-the-landing-gear-be-lowered-when-system-a-hydraulic-pressure-is-lost-in-boei

Ram air turbine is sufficient for control surfaces, which is what it's designed for

Even with a landing gear failure nothing else made sense: landing 2/3rds way up runway, no flaps, excess speed etc

Play Game Dev Tycoon half asleep, cover all bases

Believe landing would still be attempted w single working gear.. here's an occasion I remember from 97 at Heathrow. There have been more recent occasions too

https://youtu.be/NprTbTVl1Uk

Hmm even weirder. Pilot on Reddit was saying very very few reasons for gear to be disabled. I believe with no mayday either?

Yes thought I was probably wrong about that. Makes sense pulling gears isn't a priority in go around. (So we're not looking at them having retracted them)

I asked Alexa to order one in for me and my Indigo Witch just arrived..

Comments on twitter indicate there's weirdness however you look at it

• suggestion of birdstrike but not landing with any configuration consistent with that
• suggestion of loss of hydrolics but that wouldn't prevent lowering of gear
• landing 2/3rd of way up runway far too fast
• no flaps extended

Since gear and flaps are set far before runway whatever went wrong was quite far back.

Slight possibility they had birdstrike on final approach and intended go around but then had another birdstrike and lost power (resulting in forced landing in flight configuration). shrugs

Owen noted that while AI characters could be a “creative new entertainment format”, there was a risk that they might flood platforms with low-quality material that undermines creators’ craft as well as erode confidence among users.

"Hey, humanity, how's it going?"

"The world's most technical minds have found a way to make social media worse just to squeeze out just a little more profit"

"Jesus Christ"

That's totally true, but people just seem to do it less on the whole

ew..

Well that sounds vaguely positive.. It

Edit: incidentally this was an informative Real LifeLore video from a year ago. https://youtu.be/El0wIQOBPEw

Not touching them with a barge pole

Coming soon on an Amazon: Apple USB-C cable $20.99

This is a great idea, I'll definitely give it a go. How do you want to receive feature requests/bug reports?