FourPacketsOfPeanuts @ FourPacketsOfPeanuts @lemmy.world

Posts

8

Comments

992

Joined

2 yr. ago

computer-puking.gif

there's no way to monetize lemmy, right?

just making sure i'm on the right liferaft...

Boost for android

wait.. TARS was an in camera model? what?!

Indeed. Which makes it an even bigger problem that there are hardly enough moderate politicians saying "here's what we hear you saying about migration and he's what we will actually do to rectify that"

I didn't mention the censorship because he is wrong about that

I also don't agree with his quote about "no need for barriers". I wasn't aware he had said that.

He is referring to the poor handling of migration in Europe, which is true. And the general ignoring of popular outrage at how migration is managed.

That he is a fascist dickhead is indicative of the problem. Many many people who are not racist think migration is handled terribly in Europe and the problem is moderate politicians are hopelessly slow to engage with this and as a result the only people talking about it are fascist nutbags...

The problem with democracy is sometimes the majority legally vote for the checks and balances to be weakened..

Pray, I guess?

mishandling migration, and ignoring populist concerns.

I think Vance is a tool, but can someone explain how these two points aren't objectively true?

Oh it won't end

"retention bots" of some description wouldn't surprise me in the slightest..

endless wars of who's federeated with who

i've been here for months and months, i might have seen this mentioned as an aside once or twice. but "endless wars"?

It's a bit like why drilling into a wall might make the lights go out if you hit a cable. Your brain only registers "feeling" in any part of your body because a nerve carried that information to it. The nerves from your lower arm and hand pass your elbow. Hitting the nerve directly causes signals in it which you brain interprets as pain in your fingers. Presumably the nerves for the pinky side of your hand are slightly more exposed.

It would be ok.

"Internet Cafe" mid 90s. Clicked down through yahoo's directory not really knowing what I was looking for. Found the canonical list of lightbulb jokes. Funny but overall I was quite underwhelmed. Got a print magazine that listed and reviewed websites.

Simply put, because you often want to change the state of something without breaking all the references to it.

Wild off the top of my head example: you're simulating a football game. Everything is represented by objects which hold references to other objects that are relevant. The ball object is held by player object W, player object X is in collision with and holds a reference to player object Y, player Z is forming a plan to pass to player object X (and that plan object holds a reference to player object X) and so on.

You want to be able to change the state of the ball object (its position say) without creating a new object, because that would invalidate how every other existing object relates to the ball.

Evolutionarily speaking, threats from outside are an existential threat and need spreading. Good deeds at home are already known by everyone who matters and the 'reward' is survival of your children, not you 'feeling good'. People do 'hero worship' though. I think you are downplaying that. Though the influence that comes from such a position probably means people are inclined to cooperate with 'power' because it has, de facto, already shown itself to be powerful. Whereas those 'asking' for power are necessarily weak.

This is all pop-sci evolutionary psychology so discard at will...

Could it be "if it stops me getting at stuff, copyright bad. If it stops the rich getting richer, copyright good"?

This doesn't correlate with good developers at all in my experience. If I was to ask one question it would be "tell me about your passion project" or "What's the last thing you nerded out on?"

hahahahahaha nope.

Practically speaking since war is unthinkable is would result in as much economic isolation as Europe can bear. It would be the end of NATO. Almost immediately there's be European voices saying 'What's the real harm?' and other appeasers. I think the political lash back would only last 5-10 years as parties opposed would find the only tool at hand - economic punishment - to be unsustainable. It would legitimise nationalistic sentiments in Europe even further. Britain would, naturally, talk of betrayal but not be able to make any resistance of any substance.