ExtraPartsLeft @ ExtraPartsLeft @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

25

Joined

4 mo. ago

I've been told that more recently than the 2000s, but I'll be honest, I didn't really do much research into it. Sorry that I offended you by being wrong.

McDonald's does, assuming they haven't changed that recently.

That article outlines the issues with the idea really well. Thanks for sharing it.

Oh, my, god, they were right about the 4D chess all along.

Yes, and flour comes in a paper bag. It doesn't stop manufacturers from trying to protect their product from incidental moisture contact.

A company who already packs their product in plastic is going to have a much easier time switching to something like this than changing their whole packing line out for box packing machines.

I'd just like to note, Elon doesn't have majority stake in SpaceX any more. He only owns 42% as of last year. I doubt the other investors will be so keen to burn all these bridges, but I guess we'll see.

I think some of y'all are missing a lot of packaging use cases other than food. But even in the food sector, there are dry things like pasta, beans, and rice that don't have salt in them. If it really is as strong as a petroleum plastic for these items, it could eliminate tons of micro plastic.

I've never heard it pronounced like that, and I live somewhere notorious for bad pronunciation. Is there another similar word pronounced like him-all-ee-an in your local accent?

I did an image search for "European utility van" and everything I saw had a front engine compartment as a crumple zone. So I'm not sure what point you're taking to make here.

They can't legally make an ice version of this truck because of how emissions laws work in the US.

Exactly, you can usually tell someone actually needs a truck if it's got a stainless box behind the cab. Obviously there's still people who cosplay as truck drivers that will have them too, but there are other signs you can use to tell them apart.

Yeah, it would be nice to not need cars. I feel like this is a step towards function and away from vanity. Which is a good thing, even if it's not the end goal.

Are you saying that because a heavy duty, highly specialized, utility vehicle, doesn't have a crumple zone that the Slate truck is a bad design?

In my view the Slate truck is designed as a work vehicle. It's for people who need to both hual things, and have a place to store tools. It's trunk is perfect for that.

The Kei, and box trucks that we have in the US (which would have been a way better example for you to use.), are great for delivery vehicles. Jobs where you load things up and come back with an empty truck.

There's a place for both form factors. The Slate is not a bad design, it just doesn't fit what you think the use case for a small truck is.

The front trunk is a safety feature called a crumple zone and is objectively safer to be in a crash with.

Look up Saturn plastic body panels. The hood, roof, and top of the trunk we're still metal.

I had one as my first car. I got rear ended once, and the plastic parts were mostly fine (a little paint chipped off), but the metal top got bent. The trunk itself worked and I never fixed the metal.

Edit to add: the car was made in 1999, I think I bought it in 2008 and had it for about ten years. I got rid of it because the electronics were getting gremlins. Neither the paint on the plastic or metal panels had issues except for the mentioned fender bender.

It's no paint because the body is plastic. It's not even black plastic coated grey. Just grey plastic.

No, but the not as far right conservatives might. I have a cousin who bought one recently... I'm pretty sure it happened because of the Whitehouse yard sale Trump did with Musk.

Good to know that I should avoid implants.

I have three ceramic crowns and they do not have that issue at all. I was bad at my luxury bone maintenance when I was younger so I will probably have to get many more crowns in the future.

I did not interpret this to mean toothpaste is bad. All I see is greedy corporations not doing their due diligence in making sure their product safe.

I agree that the reason we've gotten to this state is due in part to sensationalist media using bad research to promote claims that get clicks/views that earn them money.

But I don't think that's the same thing at all as someone paying independent labs to test consumer products for toxins.

There are plenty of sensationalist articles about pseudo-science to get upset over. But someone who's paying for independent testing of consumer products for heavy metals is not it.

How do you think we get to the point where a researcher can get funding to do actual peer reviewed research? In the state the USA is in they won't until something like this gets the publics attention.