enkers @ Enkers @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1

Comments

1,484

Joined

2 yr. ago

It also reminds me of the incumbent NDP ridings we lost to the cons because liberal voters don't do strategic voting, yet they expect progressives to.

It's been a thinly veiled secret that the dentistry industry in Canada is rife with charlatans recommending and performing unbeneficial procedures. It shouldn't be too surprising that there's going to be an increase in scrutiny on these practices, and that it'll result in a lot of rejected requests.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ixo0V6rNqi0

I just hope it doesn't end up going too far in the opposite direction, and necessary procedures are cancelled or delayed.

That said, it also seems like a lot of these rejected claims are from mistakes in the filing process, and these should lessen as providers get acclimated.

I suppose you're right. It's irresponsible to let him plead stupidity for fleecing us, when it's all very calculated.

Carney can't decide if he wants elbows up or not. In fact, he flipflops so much, he looks like hes doing the chicken dance.

Based and mikupilled.

Tofu

May you all rot in hell.

They've strayed so far from the teachings of their own god, I'm fairly certain that's the biblically prescribed punishment.

I must have been looking away, when it happened, truely unfortunate.

This is a problem that's been brewing for a long time. Their business model is untenable at the scale they're at without relying on near slave labour. Their massive profits come more from scale, than absolute margin, so if they actually payed a living wage they'd be in the red.

So now y'all will have to wait until the coming food shortages drive up prices before the pay is enough to interest other Americans that'd otherwise have no interest in those sorts of jobs.

The owners won't play ball without getting their pound of flesh.

In that case, by all means. But deport him through the proper channels, not ICE nonsense.

As much as I'd enjoy the schadenfreude, you're right. It's impossible to take a principled stance if you only enforce it when it suits you.

If nobody votes for the party that actually represents their interests, then shockingly the party that represents their interests will not have a shot. It's a self-defeating strategy.

"Strategic" voting is a long term recipe for a US-style system where there's only room for two parties.

I think every time I switch freezers, I have to learn the lesson again. Maybe the vision of the particular freezer I'm using splattered in gooey cola tar is enough reminder, but with a different freezer, the trauma is no longer with it.

Maybe in theory, but liberals never reciprocate. We gave up multiple incumbent ridings to the Conservatives because people voted for Carney instead of the incumbent NDP, who were IMO better candidates.

That's what I said after they fucked us on electoral reform. Being a principled voter is the correct pragmatic decision in the long term.

ABC results in US two-party system.

I sincerely hope you learn something from this. This is the Liberal m.o. and has been for years. They're a big business party, and don't have typical Canadian's interests at heart. Their most redeeming feature is that they're not the Cons.

If you actually care about bettering the lives of typical Canadians, then look at what parties have track records of getting results. (Hint: A lot of Canadians just got dental care.)

One can of pop exploding in there was enough to traumatize me into never forgetting again.

Lemmy is filled with thigh-sock wearing, Arch-using catbois isn't it?

Mreww :3

Man, what a defeatist attitude. "If I can't fix everything, why even bother to make small changes for the better."

Edit: Oh, I see. This is a shitpost. Nice b8 m8, then. Ya got me.

And it's a damn shame too, because it's a very cool looking symbol. Stupid Nazis ruin everything. >:(