Eezyville @ Eezyville @sh.itjust.works

I'll do this later...

---

Read more

Posts

46

Comments

643

Joined

2 yr. ago

Looks like it's time for some alternatives. I look forward to watching this.

Is Trump and Musk the necessary evil this nation needs? Are they pissing everyone off on purpose?

Fighting Meta will cost easy more money than fighting a teenager.

And misinformation. That's how they get and hold power. Like what happened here in Ohio with the gerrymandering.

Yeah I use software to make my life easier. Not saying it isn't worth learning but time is limited.

I'll check this one out. I don't see any documentation on it so I don't know if they can sync with my banks.

Downloading this

No Firefly doesn't do it. I can't track individual securities or assets only total values of an account. I wouldn't know about any gains or losses nor total shares owned.

So that actually doesn't do what I want. It will record buying and selling of securities but only as if it were like making purchases or payments in a credit card or bank account. It doesn't keep track of the value of the security or any other asset. For example, I have a Roth account and it has a couple hundred shares of an index fund in it. Actual will only show that I spent several thousand on that index fund (listing it's name in the notes) but not the number of shares I bought and at what price at the time of purchase. I won't be able to track gains or losses for each security, only as a whole of the entire Roth. Actual doesn't do what I want it to do and I don't know enough TypeScript to contribute.

Polygraphs are a tool for interrogations. It cannot detect lies. You can easily get around them, just read The Lie Behind The Lie Detector.

Wait you're Canadian? Well duh, this is a server for both countries.

So let me be clear I wasn't trying to call you out on what happened in Georgia, I just don't know because I don't live there and I didn't want to do the research. Also I think you Canadians need to focus more on Canada and divest from America. The Republicans have shown who they are and that they'll do whatever it takes to keep and hold power. Best for the other countries to act accordingly and work amongst themselves.

Also I am aware of the threats Trump made against Canada, Greenland, Panama, and Mexico. I would like to believe that he won't act on it, someone in the cabinet will stop him, or the military will refuse to invade our allies but I have no faith. All I can say is good luck to you guys and I didn't vote for him.

OK so we're gonna assume that what you said is true because I don't feel like verifying it. The Republicans were mobilized and went out of their way to suppress votes as they always do. That much is true. What were the Democrats doing? Why didn't they stop that from happening? The Republicans were mobilized so why weren't the Democrats just as mobilized to stop them? Here in Ohio the Republicans did everything they could to spread misinformation in order to keep gerrymandering districts but the democrats couldn't stop the spread of misinformation.

But I stand by what I said. The Democrats are weak because they couldn't stop the Republicans. They need to change their strategy or continue to loose elections.

If you have 1/3 of eligible voters not voting and loyal voters switching up on you then whose fault is that? You are blaming those voters who didn't vote for who you wanted then to vote for. Why haven't you looked at the party and ask why their message didn't resonate or why they didn't convince those people to vote for the Dems? The Democrats failed. They will continue to fail unless they figure out why they aren't connecting to voters, what voters actually want, and how to change into something good for the people, the country, and can get votes.

Dude stop trying to put words in my mouth. I didn't say any of that. I already explained why I thought the democrats were weak and it wasn't for anything you just said. They are weak because they were trying to play by rules the other team clearly didn't play by, they're weak because they arrogantly thought they could keep power beyond their limit, they are weak because they stand for trends instead of standing with the people who vote for them and listening to their real problems. I can't tell you how many times the democrats would come to my community begging for votes and making promises only to walk back on those promises and never come back until the next election promising to do it then.

I never said anything about anyone ruling over me or making decisions for me. I've never whined about anyone else not solving my problems. Where did you even get that? I never even mentioned discussing politics with family, which I do, so why did you just make up more shit to throw against me.

And finally you claim I'm aligned with fascist using the evidence you literally just made up. You are part of the problem. You don't want to accept any criticism on the democrats but instead make up lies about what you claim I said or what you interpret. You don't listen but you'll use lies to discredit and silence me because I don't agree with you.

Everything in that post you claimed I said or that I represent is not true. Stop making shit up.

The Dems are weak. And it's not because they follow the law because they don't, just look at that NY City mayor. They follow the money, look at Pelosi. They aren't a party for the common person but the loudest who might net them the most money. Mostly, they're just like Republicans in the way they cling to power until their death. How many of them have died in power due to old age instead of stepping aside to let the young legislate the world they're inheriting? They try to follow agreed upon rules, not laws, knowing the other party won't follow those rules.

As an example, Obama had the opportunity to appoint 2 judges to the Supreme Court. Instead of appointing a judge after Scalia died he let the next president decide arrogantly thinking it would be Clinton. He also believe senator Graham when he stated that presidents shouldn't appoint judges during election year. Everyone with a brain knew that was bullshit! You have the power to appoint judges so do it! The second SC judge he could have appointed would replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg but that also didn't happen because she, a dem, couldn't let go of power and retire. Instead she dies in office during Trump's first term. That's the term where he appoints a SC judge during an election year and Graham forgets what he said 4 years earlier.

Now where would we be now if Obama appointed 2 more judges before his term ended? Imagine what the Supreme Court would look like if Obama called Graham's BS and RBG gave up power and retired like the old lady she was? It's shit like this that convinces me that the Democratic Party is weak.

Oh yeah, you are correct. I'll fix it.

Yes thats the one. I wasn't clear but you are right.

You think the Democrats can stand against him? They failed spectacularly during the election and many seem stubborn not wanting to change the party platform. They aren't fighting for the average person and that's why they lost.

As an American I'm not embarrassed. The whole world should have seen this coming. This country elected Trump in 2020 EDIT: My mistake, Trump was elected in 2016. Americans showed you what type of time they're on. When he lost re-election Americans tried to force his presidency. The Democrats were too weak while they had power, always trying to take the high road. If any country is still dumb enough to rely on the US for anything then they get what they get.

EDIT 2: spell check

Ah! Thanks for the clarification