Don_alForno @ Don_alForno @feddit.org

Posts

2

Comments

408

Joined

12 mo. ago

Nah. Cat eyes and witcher potions don't. They have some explaining to do.

Never put it past EA to do so.

Looking good. So... does this mean Splitscreen ? Sure looks like it.

So far I see Guardians of the Galaxy with product placement.

Who's that ugly fucker that took the Leshen's place?

Anyway, let's wait and see in what state it releases.

Gummy Bears.

FF 13 was 15 years ago, but it was also only 2 single player titles in the franchise ago if we don't count remakes. Square Enix is just very slow at making them.

That doesn't absolve them.

With the feature removed, websites can act like they didn't even go against my wishes.

A friend hosted one when we were 17 or 18. He was from the USA and had never had beer before. One of these nights he hid under a parking car when he saw a police car approaching. Fun times.

and I distinctly said that it should be "a right"

Yes, you did, but you said it as part of an answer to the question "why are landlords considered parasites?", and you explained that those who own more homes than they can live in are parasites. The logical conclusion (would be that it should be outlawed to be a landlord.

So, how am I to understand that? Should there be a quota, an acceptable amount of parasites so to speak?

People own apartments too. If you can't own more than one home, surely apartments would also be covered by that?

If that means the government subsidises it for the low income families (as in owns them and rents them at below market value), so be it.

Not everybody who doesn't want to buy is low income. I'm too lazy / risk averse to maintain everything myself, so I happily pay my landlord a reasonable premium to bear the risk of shit burning down (or breaking in less dramatic ways) for me. I also like that I would be able to pack up and move without worrying about selling my old place. I might change my mind later on, but right now I'm good.

Why should governments subsidize the lifestyle choice I'm consciously making?

You assume that everybody wants to own and that just isn't the case.

not in 12th grade listening to my classmate Jeremy try to read it without having it explained to him first. He kept pronouncing it "ARgul" rather than "arGALL" so he never heard himself say the joke.

Perhaps my English teacher could have done a better job conducting this lesson but was this really a useful exercise in reading comprehension?

My money is on "your teacher didn't know the joke either".

So ... what ... Ubisoft isn't greedy and predatory enough for them?

Everybody is the hero in their own movie.

A jury can rule somebody not guilty even if they are convinced that they did the thing.

You're not alone.

They don't. Buy on gog.