Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DA
Posts
2
Comments
406
Joined
12 mo. ago

Steam Deck @sopuli.xyz

non-steam games infinite loading screen in game mode

  • Enshittification is the process of squeezing money out of both sides of the transaction after you have built a sufficient customer and supplier base with initially attractive offerings that were possibly made at a loss.

    First the service is great for consumers (and likely bleeding money). People flock to it.

    Then they use that consumer base to lure more suppliers to the platform. Phase two. The service is great for suppliers because it means easy access to a big customer base.

    When both a lot of customers and a lot of suppliers are using the platform they start making changes that redirect revenue from both sides to the platform itself. Prices increase, fees for suppliers increase or their cut decreases, maybe they have to sign that they won't sell under a certain price elsewhere, customers can't use all things on the platform anymore without paying extra, they introduce ads, maybe exclusives, that stuff. Customers won't leave because they are used to the platform, there are network effects (all my friends use it), sunk cost fallacies (I have paid them x dollars over the years and if I leave I keep nothing for it) in the case of gamepass they have maybe stopped buying games elsewhere and wouldn't have a library at all if they lost access. Suppliers won't leave because the customer base is huge and they have no other simple way to reach those customers. Both are the literal frog in slowly boiling water. "What's a few more bucks a month, what's a little additional ad before my game loads, what's a few more % to MS when the alternative is losing all those customers". That's the enshittification part.

  • This is stupid. We pay other people to do things we can't or don't want to do all the time. That's what economy is.

    The fact that people who order takeout could also cook at home instead doesn't diminish the impact of the inflation spikes that began with Putlers invasion. You can't fix the problems of neoliberalism on an individual level.

  • That's the neat thing, they won't. It's pretty easy to apply a high tax on moving away. In fact the USA of all places do just that.

    Also, what do rich people possess? Assets. Physical assets. A big part of that is real estate, owned privately or by companies they own. There's no taking that with you. They can sell their assets and try to take the money with them, but that means the society they leave gets it's assets back.

  • It's trivial to design an inheritance tax that doesn't tax a family's (first) home and starts above a certain amount (500k, a million, two, make it 10 for all I care) that still allows lower and middle classes to build reasonable wealth. It's also not that hard to not have a million loopholes for the excessively rich. That only gets difficult when people fall for the usual lies, like "businesses will close down and you will lose your jobs".

    Start penalizing tax havens like Ireland.

    Tax based on passport, allow for taxes at their place of residence to take priority (so, you can pay low taxes in Ireland, but if it's less than our tax, you pay the rest here), tax them a lot if they relinquish their passport. No need to start international beef about this.

  • Tax property, tax inheritance, tax capital gains no matter if realized or not, tax passive income of all kinds. Tax them progressively and tax the highest brackets high enough that these giant fortunes actually shrink. There is no other way (well... besides revolution) to reduce the spiraling inequality which is at the root of major problems all over the world.

  • Steam Deck @sopuli.xyz

    2.4g Controllers and interference with USB 3 ports (e.g. docks)