If steam goes under, a significant portion of your steam games won't launch anymore, period. If GOG goes under, you can still use 100% of their installers, provided you still have them backed up. No, they are not going to be able to do that step for you. Did the store you bought physical games from put your discs in storage for you, so they wouldn't clog up your basement? Did they give you a new copy if you lost or threw out your disc and then changed your mind?
It sadly is, or at least the data protection agencies don't act against it. They only declared it illegal under the digital services act for big gatekeepers like facebook.
My English teacher (in Germany) did not know the word "evil". She concluded I meant to say "devil", but then the whole sentence didn't make sense anymore, so she deducted even more points for that.
I see no reason why "post right wing propaganda" and "write so you don't sound like "AI" " should be conflicting goals.
The actual argument why I don't find such results credible is that the "creator" is trained to sound like humans, so the "detector" has to be trained to find stuff that does not sound like humans. This means, both basically have to solve the same task: Decide if something sounds like a human.
To be able to find the "AI" content, the "detector" would have to be better at deciding what sounds like a human than the "creator". So for the results to have any kind of accuracy, you're already banking on the "detector" company having more processing power / better training data / more money than, say, OpenAI or google.
But also, if the "detector" was better at the job, it could be used as a better "creator" itself. Then, how would we distinguish the content it created?
I haven't worried about a driver update fucking something up since before win XP.
I have however repeatedly encountered crashes of games on my ps5 in the last year, which kind of defeats your point. Consoles had that worry free stability factor to them in the 90s or early 2000s, but that's long gone.
Crypto is not capital. Crypto is a poker table, where each player can only cash out what somebody else brought to the table. Buying those coins is placing a bet, not making an investment. No value is created in or by the system.
If Trump wants to buy a hamberder with his 25 billion in monopoly money he needs to find a sucker to buy the monopoly money from him at the asking price. If that sucker want to buy a Banana with it, they need to find the next sucker. It's a pyramid game, and the farther you get from the top the more likely you'll end up the one without a next sucker below you.
The reason libertarians and similar nutjobs clamor for governments going into crypto is that those governments with their virtually bottomless pockets would then become the ultimate suckers. They'd be boosting the prices for all former holders of that coin, who could then cash out big by selling to the governments. Something they currently can't do in big volumes without tanking prices.
The Zuck will embrace it. It's the other messengers that have stated that they would not work with meta. And I'm honestly with them.
I have zero hope for any possible open standard for messengers to not be comandeered by google/fb et al so that it'll end up to be a net loss in privacy and security. I have no interest to compromise my own privacy because aunt Karen doesn't want to switch apps.
It's an acquired taste. As a kid you might just want to look cool drinking beer. By the time that passes (if it does), the bitterness doesn't taste quite as bitter anymore, and other tastes come through. Same for spirits and the burning sensation.
What values?