Do you think civil engineers would build unsafe bridges because βstakeholdersβ told them to? No, because they would go to fucking jail.
sure the first iteration of the bridge would be up to spec as they need to be inspected first to be approved. So the Stakeholders would do anything to get it done, buuuuuuut maybe not with the best materials and the best engineers/workers but certainly on time in mind.
But afterwards? when it comes to maintaining the bridge; eeeh, its good enough, here a patchwork; who cares if there are potholes everywhere, you can still use it right?
We are a fucking disgrace. We need software liability laws because apparently we canβt stand up for ourselves and our profession.
Can't really stand up when CEOs constantly lay off teams. So why would one guy who stands up for what is just and right matters to them?
What? Who are we in this case? Because we as a community do know how to. The question is does our Stakeholders know that it may cost more and do they even care?
So it circles back to the meme. Does the vibe coder care if the AI Slop is maintainable, safe and secure? Or does they even know how to spot it?
Mhm okay that could be a deal breaker but you could also work around that by using OBS and use it's virtual camera to show your camera feed and your screen at the same time.
Well thats quite easy to say is it? Most professionally developed software is decades old, when standards and patterns were different. So only greenfield developed software may measure up to your ideas of good software.
And AI can only "improve" because of human created software, otherwise it would gobble itself up (Model Collapse).
Well it does make sense that the CPU has to work a bit when loading a new program.