Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DI
Посты
0
Комментарии
378
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • This sounds a lot like the one party "they're all the same" bullshit that right wingers like to propogate.

    Because make no mistake, one party is at least trying to push laws through that help (democrats), versus the other which just openly fucks people and doesn't give a shit about helping out.

  • Unfortunately the most popular content creators are the ones that cater to the lowest common denominator, so making your videos as broad as possible is best.

    If you look at the top videos around they're often not popular because they're good, often just that they're so stupid anyone can understand them like the whole focus on prank videos.

  • I know people think about the name but it makes no difference.

    Many of the top companies in the world have 3 syllables. I have zero idea what you're upset about, not to mention the obvious fact that Google themselves would have spent significantly more resources than you thinking about it and decided that it was fine.

  • Yes for all those connected Gemini devices that exist. You know ok google is 4 syllables at the moment? All that previous time lost you could be asking it to set a timer for you.

    It makes no difference and you're talking out of your ass. It's easy to change the activation code (Hey Gem!) if you want to think about some future voice activated product as well.

  • I'm not sure you're correct on the last point. My understanding is copilot gets chatgpt 4 turbo which is the paid version, as well as other parts like dall-e 3 so for free it's definitely the best option....

    And fair enough on the google stuff being free for at least 2 months. That makes more economic sense.

  • It is surprising from a competitive perspective though in that Google is behind already, so putting it behind a pay wall doesn't help with that.

    When you're the size of Google surely you make it as free as possible and lose some money to gain marketshare back.

    Why the fuck would I pay for Gemini which I've basically never heard of vs. GPT 4 which for better or worse is considered the coming of the new AI revolution.

    Also GPT 4 is easily accessible for free for most people via the Bing app, so not like you have to pay for general use.

  • Thanks I did.

    My conclusions are the same. I'd be curious to hear why a single study of 300 people for you makes you think that psychedelics are now the cure for long term relationship issues.

    Your opinion must change a lot if you base your opinion on these sorts of small studies that mean little!

  • This makes no sense/is not relevant to my comment at all...

    But sure, if you can't make an argument against it feel free to use irrelevant anecdotes. But what can you expect from a person who probably doesn't play basketball.

  • I don't disagree they can have great effects, but the research is way too limited on it.

    Again, given the actual issue - there are far better researched and understood ways of dealing with it than just taking some drugs and hoping for the best of it.

    And yes, myself and friends have taken psychedelics. I recall needing to stop my friend from cutting his penis off as he was hallucinating it was attacking him. Great solid experience.

    I'm sure there's safe dosages and if done under supervision it's fine, but we're nowhere near that at the moment and you're just as likely to have a bad experience as anything profound and good imo.

  • There's a lot of potential benefits to psychedelics. But a single study of 300 people showing one effect is hardly cause for celebration.

    There is a massive difference in using well studied and understood ways to help couples work through issues VS. Taking something poorly understood that we have close to zero understanding of the long term impact for.

    So I'm pretty comfortable saying this is bullshit until proven otherwise, and I think that's the healthiest way to do it.

    Think of it another way - there's far more research and drugs that are touted as curing cancer that go nowhere than there is support for this. It's a sexy headline but pretty useless at end of day.

  • Enraged? Because I'm suggesting long term relationship issues are extremely unlikely to be solved by short term solutions?

    Yes clearly I'm the crazy one here. Do you honestly believe that serious relationship issues can be solved by a short term acting drug? I'm sure there's a small chance, but it's ridiculous to think it'd work for more than a minority.

    But feel free to throw some baseless insults instead of providing an actual counter argument! I get it though, if you can't make an argument, easiest to just attack the person. 😊