The title for No Such Thing as a Fish comes from a fact in the QI TV series. In the third episode of the eighth series, also known as "Series H", an episode on the theme of "Hoaxes" reported that after a lifetime studying fish, the biologist Stephen Jay Gould concluded that there was no such thing as a fish. He reasoned that although there are many sea creatures, most of them are not closely related to each other. For example, a salmon is more closely related to a camel than it is to a hagfish.[8] The opening of early episodes of the podcast used to feature a recording of the elves mentioning this fact, which appears in the first paragraph of the Oxford Encyclopedia of Underwater Life.[9][10]
I played it back in like 2003. It was pretty fucking high class back then, when it came to realism. You could cook nades and decided whether you roll or toss them. You could also peek/lean. I believe it's kinda common nowadays, but those were some fancy things back then. CS wasn't even CS:GO back then, but like CS 1.5-1.6.
I never played it through Steam though.
Played on American servers and always had like 180 ping. Still managed to snipe decently.
But even back then I understood it was obviously propaganda, because you're never allowed to play as "the bad guys". You're always an American, and you're shooting people vaguely Middle-Eastern enemies. From your POV, you'll rock an M16, but from your enemy's pov, you're using an AK47.
I think if they hadn't tried forcing that bit, it might've seen more success.
Fermenting anything generally results in at most some 15-18%, depending on the yeast you use. I'd say 10-12% is more realistic for homemade wines, but 14-16 isn't out of the question.
So I don't know what the deal is specifically with dandelion wine, but usually 10% alc will fuck up a person (and a teen especially) pretty well if chugged and the brewing process usually leads to there being all sorts of things in it (alcohols sugars, not-too-toxic byproducts) so the hangovers you get from home wines are usually.... interesting, to say the least.
No see but these guys are smart and have high regard for their own life, but zero empathy for the feelings of others.
Yeah, I stay the fuck away from them nowadays as well. Got enough of that in my teens/early twenties. Wanted to see some "proper" UG culture and yeah, I did.
These people I'm talking about are just a part of any population. Anyone from 1/50 to 1/200 is a psyhopath, and some of them, just have no morals. I may be one too, but I do have strong morals.
I got a few death threats from a murderer's friend some months ago, that made me take a pepper spray with me for some weeks, as I'm not in the best shape. I'm like fucking 65-70 kilos depending on the week, and that's not tight muscle.
More of a lover and a philosopher than fighter. Criminal sure, but a not a violent one. And not a thief. But like, I sell weed in Finland, so.. tehcnically...
Yeah, uhm, not to dismiss you in any way, but I know a few non-psychopathic murderers. One was my neighbour. Nice fella. Once felt a bit threatened as he questioned me about my keys to the storage place we shared where someone had stolen a half a k of meth from him. Because I had honestly lost my second key. Luckily I found it so knew ot couldn't have anything to do with me. He made very nice food as well. Cleanest apartment I ever saw. Guy was like 55. Died some years ago. Rip.
The people I'm talking about are people who've no regard, no empathy, ans can do anything at the flip of a coin. Unless you're a massive dude (and I'm ~6ft) with training in self defense and (or) have a strap (which is very rare here), those guys will make you shit your pants.
Translate that bruv. And that was merely weeks after he got out for kidnapping and felony assault for pouring lye on someone and holding him for days. Shooting up dishwashing liquid into his neck.
You know the angles of both cats, and their relative positions (ie the angles A and C, and distance between them, b), then you can figure out the position B).
You're using three inputs, only only one of them was merely implied. But the person sitting there can see where the cats are, and thus knows their relative distance.
If cat A was (from the POV of the human) in an unfixed position, like having 30 virtual duplicates around him, or be in a magic mirror house or something, still visible at what direction he's looking at, but not where he is, then the sitter couldn't know just from the position of one cat and the angle of both cats stares.
If you're gonna be anal about it, technically "laying" could be argued to be inaccurate, (although then you'd get into the semantics about how it's technically referring to careful putting down, and I don't know if you could argue that for like, pigeons), but I'd definitely agree that all mammals have eggs.
Dasus @ Dasus @lemmy.world Posts 4Comments 3,631Joined 1 yr. ago
Well yeah. He's in the right band wagon, is my point.
He didn't pick it for the right reasons or early enough, but he is — at least in this video — on the right side.