Our adaptability is off the charts though. Like cockroach levels of crazy. Like crazier, probably, as a species, but just not as individuals.
It's just gonna be a really fucking bad time for the guys in the post-apocalyptic hellscape. I don't think it's gonna satisfy anyone's Fallout fantasies tbh.
"Fossil fuels come from the Earth, so they're green"
Every fucking day since 2016 it get's harder and harder to come up with any remotely believable satire. There's just no way of joking about reality, because that would require actually subverting expectations or exceeding norms to absurd levels, and that's actually happening constantly in real life, making it not-fun
In the military, shit isn't up for debate. You do as you're told. It is very much black and white.
(Well, from some exceptions we don't need to get to because you'd never reach the level where one has to utilise their own brain.)
edit this excludes warcrimes obviously. ALL soldiers EVERYWHERE are mandated to refuse orders that would lead to warcrimes. (how they're taught what are warcrimes is a different matter entirely)
When you're a soldier you don't really have agency over the morality of what you do, aside from being technically allowed to protest against committing war crimes.
So no.
You just generally hope the government of the military you're serving is makes the moral call.
What you're thinking of is a violent psychotic vigilante.
I must have missed this comment, clicked read some night.
So now you're pretending you haven't said the moronic things that everyone can see you have? Just how deluded must you be to do that?
You said you hadn't made ad hominems, after which I copied an exact ad hominem. You're gonna ignore that, because you're not man enough to admit to your mistakes.
You said VERBATIM; "Filial responsibility laws have nothing to do with debt to the state."
You said filial responsibility laws ONLY concern medical debt. Wrong. Simply wrong. Not only does this contradict the previous statement, which means you indirectly admit that you were wrong, but also, it's wrong as well.
See, that's why my comment, several replies ago, about you not understanding ad hom:, being personal has nothing to do with an ad hominem. I can say "you're wrong, because here's how it actually goes, here's actual sources for this claim, silly."
That's not an ad hominem.
But if I said "you're wrong BECAUSE you're silly", that would be an ad hominem.
You simply keep being wrong, but you're too small of a man to admit to a single mistake. And I'm gonna keep laughing at you for it until you have a tantrum worse than a six-year old, because again, everyone can see how wrong you are and now we're just gonna expose your childlike ego in this thread. Like I said at the start, you should've taken the gracious option.
Now you'll get schooled by me and humiliated by yourself. Although that's happened like a dozen times already. I literally had to point out LITERALLY the first words in these articles which have sources, yet all you can come up with "nuh-uh, I'm american and you're not so I know better because my arse is trustworthier than some credible sources".
Filial responsibility laws have nothing to do with debt to the state.
I can somewhat move my eyes independently. I credit this skill to us having had magic eyes books as a kid and I just learned to control eye muscles willingly.
Unless you're in a phone booth or an outhouse with the guy, you'll just take a step back. You can reach him, he can't reach you without getting through the spear first.
It's nothing special. It's blue.
Now excuse me, I'm off to imbibe vast quantities of alcohol.