Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DA
Posts
0
Comments
214
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • "Crooks was well within that range when he opened fire on Trump Saturday from about 135 meters (147 yards) from where Trump was speaking"

    Still a long shot but not as bad as 400 yards. 400 yards with iron sights would be almost impossible. 147 would still be hard but not impossible with practice. Not that this dude has practice and a scope would be cheap and infinitely easier.

  • I mean... people say this. But a head shot with normal ammunition would be the only way to ensure a kill on a target that could potentially be wearing body armor.

    I don't condone what he did, violence of this kind is never the answer. But speaking on the planning of a good marksman I would bet with this setup they would have gone for a head shot. A good marksman would never be in this situation though...

  • If there is any software you want running at kernel though it is your AV. Not saying Spotify has a reason for running at kernel though.... But running AV at kernel in theory is a better way to protect the machine and you.

  • I mean yes, but one of the issuess with "state of the art av" is they are trying to roll out updates faster than bad actors can push out code to exploit discovered vulnerabilities.

    The code/config/software push may have worked on some test systems but MS is always changing things too.

  • They also watched Trump do his normal stupid shit. I keep hearing "Bidens going to lose" "he is behind" online. But everyone I talk to in person is still voting as anticipated. Swings don't want to see Trump, Democrats wish there was a better option than Biden but will vote for him and the Republicans will still back Trump.

  • My apologies, I'm just trying to get some comments on your post to try getting it to hot so you can be seen and have conversations with people with more insight and facts.

    Everyone has an opinion, and you have done nothing to change mine with this gossip article and presenting no facts. "Biden's old shouldn't run" got it, not really a deep insight into the political policy of the US.

    I'm not ignoring the facts, you just are not presenting anything new or noteworthy.

    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/

    Whitmer vs trump 36/40 Biden vs trump 40/40

    Good luck, not everything is a debate or argument sometimes we just want conversation.

  • There has been no statement that he was not running for re election. If there was one at this point it would hurt the chances of the democrats winning.

    I suppose it depends on what polls you are listening to. But I also said "may have" to hopefully avoid this discussion because it is to early to really trust any polls.

    But this is all just my opinion and not fact. I'm not looking to get into a political debate with a random on lemmy. Have a great day!

  • I would rather not assume someone is just out to troll. I'm sure in a life-threatening circumstance, they could do any of the lines you listed.

    But if they don't have to and could just pay a little more for someone delivering it oh well. Will they pay through the nose for the convenience? Sure. Is it still a lot of money for the convenience? Yes.

    Given how active flying squid is I don't think he is just out here intentionally trolling. I could be wrong.

  • It's less bs than you think, still unlikely sure, but not a non zero chance.

    For awhile their was a single point of failure in telcom for the midwest in the us. Because the core router was so old and didn't play well with failover. It took them several months and a lot of intermittent issues to get it replaced and working as expected.

  • Unfortunately you saying that still has the same credibility as your first statement. It's just your word. I don't doubt they do on occasion but to say ALWAYS refer to themselves that way is a lot to take on word alone.

  • Even if Krav Maga teaches more attacks and more "leathal" attacks. i would hope 5 of them at the same stage as these individuals, 4th degree black belts and instructors, would be able to restrain 1 individual without permanent damage.

    When i think of someone that is that well trained i think they are trained in more than just the moves. Going through my martial arts training we were taught the fighting mentality and spirit as well as just the moves.

    Edit: I've never been through either of these training styles so I'm making assumptions and may be wrong.