Well clearly you didn't actually understand a single thing I said then.
Everything I said is related to the post itself, which I clearly stated multiple times. The post itself doesn't have a title or content, that's all I said here and that it made itself useless that way.
It's basic information sharing etiquette to have a comprehensive post with a title and a short description. Nothing more and nothing less.
That's exactly the issue I have with it, my point is that a post should contain information on the topic upfront. I don't want to get linked through to all kinds of websites just too maybe read something that I might find interesting.
I've honestly never heard of Godot, the last time I screwed around with game development was when flash was widely used and that 2d rpg engine with cookie cutter assets, but I was actually commenting more on the usefulness of this post.
Your finishing comment just shows that you didn't understand the issues I had with the post to begin with.
But that's just probably a communication issue, I might've not been as clear as I could be.
In practice it's more of a discussion platform or forum, with the accompanying expectations of having readily available content or at least a description of said content.
Lemmy might technically also be that, but it's first and foremost a discussion platform, although it has an ongoing problem with rampant bot-posts and link-dumpers.
Do you know what the great thing about 2024 is? People actually understand that digital doesn't have the same restrictions as analog.
Applying those very same restrictions would be foolish seeing how it wouldn't work as well, or even at all.
Nuance is sometimes important in these topics, no matter how much you want to act like your bullshit argument actually holds any water for some overarching topic no one was talking about.
Do you know what the great thing about 2024 is? People actually understand that digital doesn't have the same restrictions as analog.
Applying those very same restrictions would be foolish seeing how it wouldn't work as well, or even at all.
Nuance is sometimes important in these topics, no matter how much you want to act like your bullshit argument actually holds any water for some overarching topic no one was talking about.
Nah I don't want corpos to have even more information on me than they already have.
It's time for people to finally accept again that you can't shield kids from anything, especially if it seems forbidden and interesting.
Also if you really wanted to pick a verification age you would have to go with 25+. 18 years old are just legal 17 years old and 20 years are barely out of school and don't have any experience about anything. 30+ years are stuck in the system and 65+ simply don't care anymore.
Actually raise the verification age to 99+. No wait just ban social media for everyone, it sucks and is unhealthy, go tough grass or something.
So, feeling slightly better now champ?
I will mourn your reading comprehension for you, seeing as you probably have no one else willing to mourn for it.
Eat a snickers and try to not let your inner redditor out too much, k?