If you think anarchism is viable I literally don't know how we could ever in a million years agree. That is a ridiculous proposal to me beyond words, up there and equivalent to free speech absolutism.
Ignoring that, explain to me how you're going to keep democratic socialism from going off the rails if we can't even keep democratic capitalism from going off the rails?
Edit: In capitalism at least greedy people have an outlet that isn't the government. In a socialist society, the only way to be greedy is to control the government. I don't think it's coincidence that every socialist society has turned into an authoritarian state, I think it's an inevitability.
That doesn't mean there's nothing to learn from socialism or anarchism, but they are firmly non-viable strategies by themselves.
Edit: Using a movie clip as if it's some kind of enlightened source is just absurd. There's no part of capitalism that says greed is good. Capitalism is a system not an ideology, let alone an ideology that can be captured by a freaking movie clip.
Guess what, still no better system proposed, still no answer for whether the good things get credit or just the bad.
Can you prove capitalism is the source of any of those problems vs just plain human greed?
If we want to attribute every negative event to it, well what about the positive events? Did it cause the light bulb to be invented, the telegraph, the computer, the printing press, satellites, etc, or was it just the economic system at the time?
Capitalism doesn't make people greedy, lots of people just are.
Beyond that, you can beat on capitalism all you want but until someone comes up with a viable alternative, it's what we've got.
I think it's fine. Calling this an "interaction" is a pretty significant understatement.
You're going to get sued over a handful of text or not liking somebody. If you decide to run a campaign to harass an employee into quitting/suicide/etc, and throw in death threats, along with packages delivered to their residence... You should 100% get what's coming to you.
I also ended up doing this after my dad suggested it as an idea... and it's actually a really great suggestion, they work fantastically well for this purpose!
Respectfully, no. You act like Americans buying stuff on the cheap only benefited the businesses doing it. There were plenty of businesses around and plenty of people that had money to buy from them, that weren't doing things on the cheap, and people didn't. "Why pay for my silverware to be made here when I can pay a company that's oursourced half?"
This isn't about power, it's about human greed at all levels of the system. Our government (i.e. the power structure) is what actually was responsible for pushing things back the other way by introducing incentives (i.e. subsidizing doing the right thing) and introducing protected "Made in the USA" labeling. We're still nowhere near where we were.
Sure you can make the argument that people only buy cheap because they're not paid well. Again though, that's not how it was, and even now plenty of people that are paid well, pay for the cheap thing.
And again, some of these people don't even have running water. Whatever "bad deal" you think Americans have been delt in many cases the countries we outsource to have been cut far far worse deals and have no power structure to fix it.
(To be clear, I love my country, but we've got skeletons and I think it's important to talk about them and try to address them and how we got here. I don't blame "people in power", it's too easy and it's only part of the problem. We've got the wrong mindset as a society, "big, fast, cheap, and more of it")
If you're wondering who but don't want to read the article:
Their report urges federal agencies to investigate and potentially go to court over the wealth of information that H&R Block, TaxAct and Tax Slayer shared with the social media giant.
Dark Arc @ Dark_Arc @lemmy.world Posts 2Comments 208Joined 2 yr. ago
If you think anarchism is viable I literally don't know how we could ever in a million years agree. That is a ridiculous proposal to me beyond words, up there and equivalent to free speech absolutism.
Ignoring that, explain to me how you're going to keep democratic socialism from going off the rails if we can't even keep democratic capitalism from going off the rails?
Edit: In capitalism at least greedy people have an outlet that isn't the government. In a socialist society, the only way to be greedy is to control the government. I don't think it's coincidence that every socialist society has turned into an authoritarian state, I think it's an inevitability.
That doesn't mean there's nothing to learn from socialism or anarchism, but they are firmly non-viable strategies by themselves.