Don't forget all that Uranium they stole from the US under operation Apollo, or their plan to bomb overseas US/UK venues, I think it was the Lavon Affair...
...or the US citizens killed during the attack on the USS Liberty.... Or the fact that Ghislaine Maxwell's father Robert is a Mossad agent!
All that harm done to the US and Presidents are still friendly with them. What a mental illness.
Our discussion was never about the term factuality. You've just now raised that term for the first time in this discussion. You said search engine. They are in fact searching and reconstructing data based on a probabilistic data space.
...and there are plenty of examples of search engines being sued for the types of data they've explored or digitized.
...also the inference that search engines are "accurate" or don't serve up misinformation, and manipulated data is foolish.
It's searched in training, tagged for use/topic then that info is processed and filtered through layers. So it's pre-searched if you will. Like meta tags in the early internet.
Then the data is processed into cells which queries flow through during generation.
99% of what it generates doesn't come from anywhere in particular, and you wouldn't find it in any of the sources which were fed to the model in training.
Yes it does - the fact that you in particular can't recognize from where it comes: doesn't matter. It's still using copywrited works.
Anyways you're an AI stan, and defending theft. You can deny it all day, but it's what you're doing. "It's okay, I'm a software engineer I'm allowed to defend it"
...as if being a software engineer doesn't stop you from also being a dumbass. Of course it doesn't.
"data gathering" and "training data" is just what they've tricked you into calling it (just like they tried to trick people into calling it an "intelligence").
It's not data gathering, it's stealing. It's not training data, it's our original work.
It's not creating anything, it's searching and selectively remixing the human creative work of the internet.
They are. They record the data, stealing it. They search it (or characteristics of it), and reprint it (in whole or in part) upon request.
Viewing it as something creative, or other than a glorified remixing machine is the problem. It's a search engine for creative works they've stolen, and reproduce parts of.
They search the data-space of what they're "trained" on (our content, the content of human beings), and reproduce statistically defined elements of it.
They're search engines that have stolen what they're "trained on", and reproduce it as "results" (be that images or written text, it has to come from our collective data. Data we created). It's theft. It's copywrite fraud. Same as google stealing books (which they had to he sued over the digitizing of, and enter into rights agreements over).
Searching and reproducing content they've already recorded (aka stolen without permission), is absolutely part of what they are. Part of what they do.
Don't stan for them or pretend they're creative, intelligent, or doing anything original.
The real lie is that it's "training data". It's not. It's the internet, and it's not training - it's theft, it's stealing and copying (violating copyright). Digital stealing, and processing into a "data set", a representation or repackaging of our original works.
Pants used to be two parts that were joined by lacing them together like shoes at the crotch. So weaving lashed together from the belly button to the groin to the ass and back up to the lower back.
I believe puffy white undershorts would be worn underneath, and sometimes a codpiece.
Yes, AFTER the fact. But before that, the area was the charge of PA police.
A member of the Butler County ESU then shot at Crooks and hit his rifle, preventing him from firing more shots. Ten seconds later, Crooks was shot and killed by the Counter Sniper Team of the United States Secret Service.[13]
Inches count. How'd the shooter fair? He still kicking? But also, candidate Trump was just a candidate then. More events back then meant less planning, with worse personnel.
He's not having that rapid stream of events to attend these days. They get more planning if there are fewer big public events, and it's the Secret Service's presidential agents protecting him now.
....what's the end game anyways? Putting Peter Thiel's avatar in charge?
It's always a first time assassin, incompetent enough to think it's possible vs a team of professionals trained in the prevention of such events, who are part of a long lived organisation focused on that task alone.
The secret service are dedicated en mass to stopping such events and have been successful the majority of times.
No the chance is not zero, but it's near enough. You're welcome to put that to the test. But you'd be better off doing a historical analysis of modern era coups.
Nice fantasy. But that's all it is. He'll have bullet proof glass, weapons aren't allowed at his rallies. You don't think people tried this with Hitler, Stalin, and Putin? It's said there were over 600 attempts on Castro's life. He died of old age.
Hell, people tried it with Nixon, Regan, and Obama, people try these things all the time.
No they don't. There's already been multiple failed attempts on his life. People have tired your methods. He has helicopter to get away from the hoards.
Good point about Putin and the kompromat, however to assume it's Trump designing these plans is a bad move.
Trump didn't design Project 2025, but he's followed much of it regardless. Trump is a salesman.
Peter Thiel, Marc Andreesen, Sam Altman, lots of billionaires are invested in libertarian projects, cities, or fifedoms. Lots of them also fund, follow, or push the ideas of Curtis Yarvin about destroying democracy.
So you're right, it might not be Putin.
That said Trump is a Narcissist, and narcissists do tend to care about how they're perceived... Plus there are people like Victoria Spartz who are now in the Senate, but whom have ties to Russian interests.
... it's not always about the kompromat, it's often just about how many ties around the individual (who have influence on their actions) also have interests in the direction pushed.
Don't forget all that Uranium they stole from the US under operation Apollo, or their plan to bomb overseas US/UK venues, I think it was the Lavon Affair...
...or the US citizens killed during the attack on the USS Liberty.... Or the fact that Ghislaine Maxwell's father Robert is a Mossad agent!
All that harm done to the US and Presidents are still friendly with them. What a mental illness.