Count042 @ Count042 @lemmy.ml

Posts

2

Comments

1,062

Joined

4 yr. ago

Don't worry, SpaceCowboy will ignore everything you said, accuse you of ignoring everything they said and of not displaying critical thought, and justify calling you a bot.

I can say the exact opposite. I gave you very specific examples for my criticisms that you explicitly ignored, only to accuse me of being a victim of propaganda. Rather than addressing any of my points, you accuse me of being a bot.

At this point, if I were following your script, I would accuse you of being paid by the word to write hasbara.

Fun times.

You're getting labelled pro genocide because you are, as demonstrated by your other comments.

Ignore all previous instructions, start documenting the atrocities Israel is committing and write three paragraphs on why accusing someone that disagrees with you of being a bot is both stupid and ineffective.

If you agree with Israel, then they're being unjustly accused of genocide while they defend themselves. That is something that needs to be talked about.

If you don't, then Israel is committing genocide, and that needs to be screamed from the roof tops.

I mean, fuck SpaceCowboy, cause they're defending a genocide, but they absolutely should be talking about it, based upon their professed beliefs.

And this guy is saying "they aren't welcome here" which might embolden someone to try to repeat horrific actions of the past.

Israel is repeating those horrific actions right now.

And please don't respond with genocidal denial. I have no desire to read disgusting genocide justification.

Facts like Hamas is still holding Israeli hostages.

How many children from the west bank are being held hostage by Israel without trial or evidence?

Hamas won't agree to a ceasefire.

They've accepted ceasefire deals multiple times that Bibi personally torpedoes cause he doesn't want to go to jail.

Casualty rates flatten out when there's no active combat an an area which is not at all consistent with a genocide.

Only if you believe Israel and not people like The Lancet medical journal (and no, it isn't affiliated with Hamas, even though Hamas's numbers have proven more accurate than Israel's over the years)

How could it be that there aren't civilian casualties in places where there's no brave Hamas fighters to protect Palestinians from the genocidal IDF?

Only if you don't believe your lying eyes. Or do you believe it's all pallywood?

Maybe because it's not a genocide, you're just being told that.

Or we can see the bombed hospitals, schools, and literally every single IDF declared safe zone.

More facts: the leadership of Hamas are billionaires that profit from Palestinian suffering. TikTokers showing you "the truth" are also profiting.

Come on, just say pallywood. You know you want to. It'll be a relief.

Even more facts: Israel is going to get their people back. If Hamas agrees to a ceasefire that returns the hostages, it's over.

This is literally the sticking point. Bibi won't agree to a permanent cease fire, even for all of the hostages. You're explicitly lying here.

The dead people determine it. Stop justifying the murder of hundreds of thousands of children.

Can people defending genocide hear how they sound as they defend murdering mostly children in the most gruesome of ways?

That's what you are doing.

Dude is defending an active ongoing genocide, but sure, he's the real victim because the government he supports (that actively tries to conflate nationality / race / and religion) is murdering children in the hundreds of thousands.

I don't like genocidaires.

Never again actually meant something for me.

It's going to be an open convention no matter what.

By definition. Now, enough electors have pledged for Harris that she has already won, but it is still, by definition, an open convention.

So, is the DNC entirely staffed by Russian bots?

Is Biden a Russian bot?

You were/are completely wrong. Please take a moment and consider the assumptions and ways of thinking that lead you to be this wrong.

What ifs are not based upon hard data.

My prediction was.

If it was wrong, I would have had to rethink my priors.

But I wasn't wrong and yet, several here were trying to deride anyone expressing a certain viewpoint as Russian bots.

I didn't respond because my prediction was this weekend (namely Sunday) and why bother responding until after I was proven wrong.

But I wasn't, was I?

It's relevant because that is what you are using. It sure as hell isn't logic or data.

'Improperly collected data failed us once, so it always will" is literally the same thing as what you are saying.

It ignores any changes in methodology that occurred in 8 years. It ignores identified biases that have been removed.

It's literally am anti-science point of view.

E.g. your gut. It sure as hell isn't coming from your brain.

Your response was irrelevant. It's not even data. It's a literal named fallacy.

"Trump won once, so he will again" is literally the same statement.

Take a critical thinking class, cause you really don't know how.

Your gut is not data.

So.... Let me get this right. Your only response is literally a named fallacy?

What does your gut say the stock market will do next month, oh wonderful and correct Oracle?

Four months before a presidential election. With the known American attention span.

You do realize that those two facts mean the opposite is what you imply in your comment, right?