Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CO
Posts
2
Comments
1,062
Joined
4 yr. ago

  • it's not even about science, it's about principle.

    How to say "I've never heard of public health" without saying "I've never heard of public health"

    Also a case of "the accusation is the confession." The literal next sentence is "but what about my FREEEEEEDOM!?!?"

    The science behind this is literally highschool chemistry and highschool statistics.

  • It's funny. I look at blocking as some king of moral judgment against the community, and so I don't end up using it to shape my feed due to annoyance.

    But, man, would I like to browse all without a million 196 posts.

    Maybe it's time I start.

  • The majority of Palestinians weren't even born when that last vote occurred.

    There is no intellectual integrity in this question.

    I honestly can't think of a non-bad faith reading of this comment.

    Sorry, I should have said the majority of Palestinian's before the war weren't even born.

    Given that starvation kills children first and the lancet medical journal estimated the dead at around 200,000 (or 10%) of the population, that may no longer be true.

    EDIT: Does the CCP represent the will of the Chinese people? They have more of a say in their leaders than Gazans did. Or is this just a double standard that only applies to the enemies of the state of Israel?

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

    There, I pasted it from the sidebar for you. The bit you violated, and the only comments that got removed, was where you called other people bots.

    You never answered the question as to how you think Hamas could commit the process of genocide against Israel.

  • I'm 45.

    Supporting genocide is a good reductive test for if someone has any kind of morality. Same as with racism.

    The fact that you don't recognize that, and think that not recognizing that makes you an adult that is not a cartoon says everything about your morality.

    It says nothing about my age or how many people I interact with.

    EDIT: You also didn't answer the question on why you think Genocide shouldn't be a reductive label.

    Do you think that genocide is ever justifiable?

  • I don't need to try again, but when you post seemingly innocuous opinions that tangentially touch on your support for genocide without referencing it, and I see it, I will post so that others will know that they are interacting with something posted by someone that supports genocide.

  • Yeah, but you celebrate the genocide. I know you post a lot so the arguments between us from months ago will be far back in the history, but there is nothing surprising about someone who justifies genocide siding with the candidate who served in the military that is currently committing genocide.

  • Is this just propaganda?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SLwaodt_Rw

    This is the intentional destruction of a key water supply that supplies water to 1 million people.

    This is an action that is part of the genocidal process.

    Before you claim Pallywood, or that I'm being lied to, or any of your other stupid and lazy justifications for genocide, this is a video proudly taken by an IDF soldier who is happy to take this genocidal action.

    EDIT:

    Also wanted to pick your brain and find out if you back the soldiers mutiny at Sde Teiman in defense of their right to rape the male prisoners? This is being reported by Haaretz here: https://archive.ph/oeQMG#selection-531.29-531.39

    Or let me guess, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz is secretly Hamas propaganda, right?

  • No. It wasn't. It was a extremely bad assault that hit civilians. Or, whatever words you want me to use to describe a horrible thing that was wrong to do. But words have meaning. And describing all bad things generically as genocide cheapens that word.

    Now, before you feel self righteous and start issuing the claim of antisemitism you so transparently want to claim, I want you to think about something. Actually think about it, too, before answering.

    Can Hamas commit genocide against Israel, and if so, how? I'm obviously not asking about it they are capable of the desire. I'm specifically asking if it could happen, how would it be done? Do you think Hamas, a military force of some 25,000 fighters before the war, with no air force, and nothing other than light weapons and rudimentary rockets could commit genocide against a first world nation? How would they achieve that process with those resources?

    I've actually answered your questions in good faith. Are you actually capable of the same?