I interpreted it as a stereotype of certain privileged classes of white people that are so out of touch with the struggles of the world that they don't realise how dangerous it is to try this. In fact, I think there has been cases of upper/middle-upper class people who have gone on these kinds of tourism-pilgrimage and have ended up dead.
The ideas have always been there, it's just a bottle neck on cheap electronics and people figuring out the foundation technology. I can't think of to many tech advancements that have surprised me; that's not too say they aren't impressive, but just about anything we can imagine is possible.
The main thing I don't expect to see is useful and reliable brain/electronics interfaces. I think biology is too unique for an of the shelf product to be possible, which means it's too hard to make a profitable product.
The Australian government is heavily criticised for half-assing fibre internet because they did copper to the house in most cases. We still, a decade later, have one of the worst internet in the western world.
I think satellites are likely much cheaper to deliver internet to a whole continent than trying to run bloody copper.
I don't think climate change will prevent reaching that number, but it will increase the suffering. If we don't start reversing climate change I believe we will try to adapt to it until we reach the limit of our ability to adapt before we perish. If we are lucky, a small fraction of the species will survive long enough for something to be able to change, but I'm talking a really long time.
That's a plus. I drove a hire car with a joystick/dial/button thing that could control the touch screen. It was so much easier to pay attention to driving while controlling something on screen. With touch screens you need to watch your finger as you press because there's no tactile feedback.
Windows started life as a window manager that you installed on top of MS-DOS. It has since grown to be much more, and I don't think you can criticise it for that.
Also, changing the visual theme is their prerogative. They are not required to supply a "classic" theme, even though they did do that a bunch of times.
I get Lemmy is the bird around here, but if you're going to bad mouth Windows, at least do it for the many legitimate problems it has.
Windows 8 was when MS were trying to break into the phone OS market to complete with Android and iOS. They wanted to have the "same OS" across phone, tablet, and desktop, which isn't a terrible idea except for the fact you need to betray your entire desktop customer base to get there.
That's enough money to have a good life and provide a good life to your loved ones. If he never finds it, he is a crazy man. If he finds it he is a smart man. A normal person can't earn that much in a lifetime. Even a miniscule chance of finding it could drive someone to obsession.
For the sake of his sanity, and for a good story, I hope he finds it, but I doubt he will.
I interpreted it as a stereotype of certain privileged classes of white people that are so out of touch with the struggles of the world that they don't realise how dangerous it is to try this. In fact, I think there has been cases of upper/middle-upper class people who have gone on these kinds of tourism-pilgrimage and have ended up dead.