Cosmicomical @ Cosmicomical @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

562

Joined

2 yr. ago

"Their" is the keyword here, they think they own the users

I'm sure there would be workaounds to that, also I'm not selling anything, just sharing a project and list of components. i'm not a lawyer but i'm pretty sure there's nothing they can do to stop me

I usually ask after the interview and after i've received the offer. At that point it doesn't impact the selection process and you are still in time to reject if you want.

Wasn't this the plot of an episode of bear?

Even if what you said was true, i think the better choice would be to go in the direction of simplicity, not the direction that favours segregation.

I think it's time for an open source 2d printer project, we have open source 3d printers and the technology is much more complex than 2d. Time to put HP to sleep

Plot twist, downstairs there is a fantastic free access party

No u

This shitpost brought to you by Microsoft

I see this as a victory

Ah yes absolutely non-violent, the guys going around with cable ties just wanted to do some cable management.

Those executives should be fired. Or at this point they should just set prices regardless of market, even though no one will buy at that price point. Same ridiculous logic.

For a bunch of guys always talking about prophets, their belief system has zero predictive power.

So it's not so easy to implement after all

How comes I never saw that implemented, then? Progressive taxation stops "progressing" at around the 100k threshold and that's basically just a decent salary. The Rich are never really affected by it.

Carbon credits would be a way to level the ground in some situations and could give you a right to say NO to people consuming more than their share, or at least account for externalities and get paid if you allow them to use your "quota".

I would call it an "insert"

With Carbon tax only the rich win, we need carbon credits

Just because you're the CEO of a big company, it doesn't mean you know what you're talking about. In this case it's clear he doesn't. You may say "but the company makes a lot of money" and that's not a point in his favor either, as this is a clear example of survivor bias. Coding is going nowhere and the companies laying off people are just a proof CEOs don't know what they are doing.

For years there have been open source solutions ready for basically any purpose, and if that has not made coders useless, nothing will. Maybe they will change designation, but people that understand what's going on at a technical level will always be necessary.

There have been some situations in the past few years that made the situation less clear-cut, but that doesn't make coders optional.

Sorry it was just a joke, you broke the sentence in two in a way that makes "With bullet time" sound like an advertisement.

I don't think they have that much potential. They are just uncontrollable, it's a neat trick but totally unreliable if there isn't a human in the loop. This approach is missing all the control systems we have in our brains.