Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
3,230
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • it does not revoke other parties’ already existing rights unless they invoke this licence to use your work

    You left out the part about the commercial usage. But then again, you are not a lawyer.

    From the license...

    Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant.

    Listen, we're not going to agree on this. If you want to keep replying about it, I can keep telling you I disagree with you, and we can keep just keep going around in circles, forever.

    Or we can just agree to disagree, and move on.

    But in either case, I'm going to continue to use the license in my comments/content.

    If you’re not ready to defend yourself don’t spread misinformation.

    I'm not, and debating/discussing is not the same as being harassed/bullied.

    There's already a post in a community where this is being discussed, and there's no reason to derail other posts in other communities.

    If you have more to say to me about the subject, say it there...

    https://lemmy.world/comment/9850401

    Otherwise, Feel. Free. To. Block. Me.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • People calling you out for being wrong isn’t astroturfing.

    There's been plenty of astroturfing going on in the last week. Not all comments are, but some are, and they have been repeating daily (can almost set a watch to it). In fact, they've been kind of sloppy and over the top in some cases. Didn't think a Creative Commons license would trigger some astroturfer so badly, but apparently they really fear people using a license with their content/comments.

    And as far as calling me out, constantly doing so over and over again, repeating the same points endlessly, is not something that is just 'calling me out for being wrong', that's harassment/bullying. I've heard/talked to the people who disagree with me, so there's no reason for them to repeat themselves to me endlessly and following me around from community to community, on a daily basis. Especially when by them following me they derail conversations in posts I've commented on (unless you want to explain to me how using a Creative Commons license is related to "What plot holes could be adequately explained away with a single shot or line of dialogue?").

    The place to discuss this issue is here: https://lemmy.world/post/14942506

    It’s not an anti-AI licence and by definition does not restrict use (including AI-related) more than standard automatic copyright.

    It talks about non vs commercial usage right in the license, so you are incorrect (and I'm betting not a lawyer also). Also, I got that name from someone else who also uses the license, so at least one other person agrees with me. Finally, it has restrictions in it that are not mentioned in the standard automatic copyright.

    Besides all that, WTF is it to you? What business of this is yours? Are you some kind of 'commercial' police making sure commercialism is not slandered or something? Its a weird thing to get hung up on, let alone try to abolish/remove.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • That’s not a lemmy.world link

    When you hit reply to a comment from the web client, there are several editor buttons you can press, like 'B' for bold font, 'I' for italic, etc. The farthest to the right is a circle with a '?' mark in it. The link I supplied is the same as pressing that button.

    So if you don't trust the link I gave you, go to https://lemmy.world/ in your web browser, and hit the reply button for any comment, and then press the circle with a '?' inside of the circle button, and you'll be taken to the same page as "https://join-lemmy.org/docs/en/users/02-media.html".

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • Don't think of it as them being unprofessional, think of it as them having a safety valve to relieve the pressure of some people wanting to leave Reddit for Lemmy or elsewhere, because of their bs.

    Someday, when they're confident enough that they have customer retention locked in, that methodology of bypassing will be removed.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • They’ll keep the talent they want, and fire everyone else. “Talent Acquisition”.

    Would have been cheaper for them to just poach the few talented people, under your scenario.

    (And yeah, but, they'd be able to work around the poaching contracting/legal issues. They always do.)

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • A lot of people misunderstand economic systems by anthropomorphizing (it means to give them human characteristics) them, giving them the illusion of thought or feeling.

    Just in case that was directed at me, versus part of your overall opining, I do not.

    It's an economic and social system, 'Bartering 2.0', and not a mechanical or otherwise thing.

    Good opinion piece overall though.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)