Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
3,230
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • From the article ...

    “Without these standards of decency and morality, this planet may rapidly descend into anarchy, never-ending wars, and barbarism.”

    AKA, "the center will not hold".

    I want to live in the alternate timeline, with President Sanders.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • Holy shit, guy with a stutter and a long and storied history of misstatements and malapropisms says something incorrect. News at 11:00, folks!

    It's more like following breadcrumbs to the edge of a cliff.

    If you don't look up and look around, and see the whole picture, and instead just continue to follow the breadcrumbs, you'll fall down into the chasm.

    Mental cognitiveness is a valid thing to judge someone by, when you're voting for them.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • From reading the article it definitely seems like there was some attitude being given to the judge.

    From the article...

    "If you don't like my ruling, you don't say 'jeez,' and you don't say 'strike it,' because I'm the only one who can strike testimony in court," Merchan said.

    That seems like someone else besides the Director yelling "Cut!", when making a movie.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • I think it will be impossible for us to asses how much it actually impacts function in real world use case.

    Does seem fair though to say that if you have 85% less data input/probes, that you're losing some to a large amount of fidelity, than an algorithm can only make up so much for.

    A potentionally bad analogy, but think of it as a high bitrate versus a low bitrate, for listening to music. The quality of the music will be notably different, but you would still be able to hear both of the songs in their entirety.

    At the end of the day, it's a lack of data that was originally expected for the algorithm to work with, that is now missing.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • From the article ...

    Thwaites, which already contributes 4% to global sea level rise, holds enough ice to raise sea levels by more than 2 feet. But because it also acts as a natural dam to the surrounding ice in West Antarctica, scientists have estimated its complete collapse could ultimately lead to around 10 feet of sea level rise — a catastrophe for the world’s coastal communities.

    That's a lot of beachfront and riverside properties that would end up going underwater.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • How do you cope with, life and the decaying world around you?

    Decay is a constant. But so is renewal. If you remember that, then that gets you through your life experiences.

    Mine is nostalgia. That’s literally my copium drug and it really is strong some days.

    Nostalgia is great, especially in helping you remember the past. But you shouldn't focus exclusively on that, as then it just becomes a drug, and you become the monkey in the cage pushing the button over and over again for the next pellet of food.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • Why did you attach a link about Creative Commons and copyright laws?

    Oh, no particular reason at all. Just seemed like a fun thing to do.

    🤷😋😇

    All kidding aside, that's something of a loaded question.

    Instead of a repeating myself, yet again, let me just point you to this topic...

    https://lemmy.world/comment/9850401

    Just click on the "View all Comments" link, to go to the top of the topic. It's a full discussion.

    If you want something more recent (like yesterday recent), then I'd point you to this topic...

    https://lemmy.world/comment/10144269

    Otherwise, you can look through the last threeish weeks of my posting comment history, and you'll see the same subject come up multiple times, and be discussed.

    Edit: Wow, seven down votes in just a few seconds from time of posting the comment. That must be a record.

    Edit2: Hmmm, the responses seem strangly familiar. ... 🤔 Seems like someone is trying really hard to push a certain agenda/perspective.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • If you click “source” on a deleted comment, you can see what was written before it was deleted on the Mlmym interface.

    Sounds like they're caching the comments, and not honoring the deletion request by removing the comment from their cache.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)q

  • Can you at least make the text smaller? That way people aren’t as bothered by it, but you still have your licence?

    I already did actually, a couple of weeks ago.

    I'm using the Lemmy web editor. The web client doesn't let you change font sizes, but it does let you mark font as subscript or superscript, which is a smaller font size, so I did that.

    My understanding is some mobile clients have problem with the subscript/superscript formatting, and the cause of that is on their end, not supporting the format text yet.

    If you don't see my license declaration in a smaller font, direct the devs of your client to look at this page, which is the formatting instructions from Lemmy, and specifically the subscript and superscript formatting.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • Nice stats, thanks for sharing.

    But you need to add one more stat, for paywalled or not, including if they count how many articles you've read before they put up the 'must subscribe' paywall.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • Others don't see the text of the comment though, it just says comment is deleted.

    To answer your question, basically for Federation reasons (if I had to guess).

    Its the same way with when you block someone, you're not blocking them from the seeing you, you're blocking yourself from seeing them. They can still respond to your comments and you wouldn't know they had.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • If your comments are going to gum up the thread with a segment that they don’t think will have any effect, what’s a few more to match?

    Well their comments are their responsibility, not mine (you shouldn't 'blame the victim'), so I can't talk towards their actions, except to say that each of us are supposed to behave civilly here on Lemmy, and not bully others to conform.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • “Your license doesn’t do what you say it does.”

    “Haha, joke’s on you, I don’t want it to do what I say it does.”

    Glad we figured that one out.

    Whatever lets you sleep at night.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially.

    That's just a description of what the license actually does, non-commercial usage of my content.

    It's actually not even my description, it's one I got from someone else, who's also licensing their content with the same license.

    I have no problem with my content being used for non-commercial purposes.

    You have completely different motivations.

    No, I do not. My intent aligns with ProPublica.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • Remember I’m pullin’ for ya–we’re all in this together. ✊🏼

    Thanks, and no disrespect meant, but I would believe that more if you did license your own comments as well.

    In case you need the formatting for it, here it is...

    [~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en)

    Feel free to replace the link to point to whatever license you wish to use for your own content, if you do not want to use the same one that I am using.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)