Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
3,230
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • And I’m assuming just having “all content licesed under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0” in your bio wouldn’t work?

    I'm not sure if I understand your question.

    I believe it does work. Or at least it should, and I shouldn't give up my right to license my own content just because enforcement of laws is lax.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • Do you spend a lot of time arguing with people over it?

    Allot more than I wish, I really try not to. Even today, I keep asking people to not rehash it, and lets just talk about the topic my comment was posted in. But for some strange reason people just won't let it go, and push to talk about it.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • lol the comments of the post you linked are saying that it’s completely useless

    Its obvious you didn't read the whole thing. The brigading was in full force on that post.

    Try scrolling down, you'll see the other side being expressed.

    Also, here's a comment from today (with my response) that describes the other side of the argument, in case you don't want to be bother to relook at the original link, further down.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • but their lifelong detachment from reality as they live in a privileged bubble

    Does that include Bernie?

    Wisdom can be written down, that would be more wise to do anyway.

    Something written may not be read. Better to have both, the Wisdom at ground zero in real-time (especially if the feces is hitting the fan), and written down afterwards for posterity's sake.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • I officially feel sorry for you now.

    Thanks, appreciate that. Would really rather just talk about the issues being posted, thats for sure.

    I’ve seen this happen to you multiple times now (in the same day!)

    If you think today was rough, you should either check out this, or just wade through my comments from 9-10 months ago.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • The reason why this might work on Lemmy but not on corporate Social media is that corporate social media often have terms of service that require you to give them ownership/rights/etc. Lemmy has no such ToC.

    Actually, Safe Harbor laws would encompass social media sites as well, so it would work there as well.

    Either corporations own the content you post and are responsible for it, or they just host your content you post that you own and are immune from harm for the content. The law is currently the latter, and not the former.

    Also, law trumps ToS's.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • Well I don't game on Windows, so their Windows drivers could still suck. But I used to on my RX 6800 XT before switching to Linux, and I did not have driver problems with Windows at all.

    My son had a 5X00 gen card, and he can't wait to get away from AMD because of driver issues he's having all the time, when playing LoL in Windows. I'm having a hard time convincing him to make his next card AMD because of that, even with all of the current Nvidia shenanigans going on. So, I do get where you're coming from, drivers wise.

    But all I can vouch for reliably is that my all AMD rig with a RX 6800 XT card works great, no driver issues/crashes. My biggest headache is sometimes having to select a different version of Proton for when I'm playing a game (thank god for protondb.com).

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • AMD seriously needs to start taking driver support seriously.

    That's been an issue for them in the past, but not recently. Last I heard, the quality of their drivers has improved allot from two generations ago.

    I game on an all-AMD Linux (Fedora/KDE) rig, and I haven't had one crash with any game that I play (via Steam/Proton).

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • Honestly I don’t believe it would help myself

    It would help if the companies that are training their LLMs honor content creators licenses. If they ignore the law in that, then it would in theory need to be policed.

    In either case, its a quick copy/paste on my part, so /shrug.

    As someone else mentioned, it’s probably people who simply have to correct others when they don’t share the option. Doubt it would be anything like being in support of LLMs, probably the opposite.

    I don't know. It would behoove those who need our content to train their LLMs to intimidate/redirect people away from licensing their content. And I can't imagine regular people getting so caught up to spend so much time on this issue. If you look through my comment history, starting 9-10 months ago, and see how many replies I've gotten, and even how posts talk about this issue (https://lemmy.world/post/14942506), I can't imagine a single link would cause all of that. Theres got to be something more to it than that.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • https://lemmy.world/post/14942506

    That's just one example. I particpated in that conversation.

    If you just looked through a few of my comments from tenish months ago, you'd see allot more of that kind of 'discussion' directed at me.

    Otherwise, the only link needed is the one I have in my comments, that points to the license that I'm using on my content.

  • I'd rather we judge on mental capacity and not on physical age (so that in theory wisdom is not lost), but there is something to be said for giving someone else a chance to drive the car.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • Just add a link for crying out loud!

    How about we don't talk about licensing in comments instead? Especially when it derails the topic being discussed. Or even just them blocking me, and moving on, that would work for them too.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • Voting wise, yes-ish, but the disenfranchised people tend to hold opinions from one side or the another anyway, and just don't bother to vote (which is another completely different problem), plus there's a few with third-party ideas and fewer still with a 'let it all burn down they're both aholes' mindset in there as well.

    The OP was judging based on the voting results (which these days are very 48-50%/48-50% splits), but condeming the whole population, voters or not.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • Why are you so emotionally invested in this? You replied to them replying to someone else. Why are you so upset? If it’s a sovcit, who cares about their stupid bullshit? Why did you continue to interact by replying to a reply that wasn’t directed at you? If it’s a troll, why do you care?

    Man I'd love the answer to that question. So MANY people get bent out of shape over me licensing my own content, both in the past, and even now today.

    One of my comments today was ratioing very positive, then all of a sudden in the last couple of hours all at once swung way over to ratio into the large negative. Its almost like its being brigaded or something. And I can't understand why someone would waste their time to do that, truly. They could just easily ignore me and never worry about having to see any of my comments with a licensing link in them again, but instead, they come at me over and over and over again, on a daily basis.

    At this point I gotta imagine its Corporations using our posts/comments to train their LLMs, and not wanting the trend of people licensing their own content to take off.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • That was before I realized we were dealing with a sovcit.

    Don't even know WTF a 'sovcit' is. /shrug

    Edit: I went to look it up. Yeah, no, I'm not one of those, I pay my taxes, etc.

    But I do believe in the fact that not just corporations are capable of using laws for their own interests.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0