Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CO
Posts
25
Comments
232
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Still haven't seen the first season and am not too familiar with Dever's work, so I'm indifferent to this casting. Cool that she was Cassie Drake though.

    I do hope she nails it. TLOU 2 was one of the most profoundly impactful works of art I've experienced: it exposed my susceptibility to bias resulting from narrative framing. Abby's depth of character was essential to that experience.

    I also hope they keep the narrative structure from the games. The shock of the midpoint twist was also essential.

  • You think it'll make money?

    Mainly because of the hype/marketing, but I may be overestimating it. It's a good point that Avengers bombed, but I do think Rocksteady is a more competent developer than CD (I'm not personally a big fan of their Tomb Raider games).

    I also just tend to think anything is possible until it isn't. It wouldn't be the first game to buck expectations if it somehow managed to be a hit.

    Either way, the fact that this is the only game Rocksteady releases in nearly 10 years will be a deep source of bitterness.

  • I'm really interested for this game to release. I expect it to be a critical failure and a commercial break-even, mostly due to Rocksteady's (as yet untarnished) pedigree and marketing.

    But I also haven't ruled out that it will be a surprise hit. I didn't even realize this wasn't being fully marketed as a live-service game, and who knows, maybe all the hogwash in this article about the "trinity" of gameplay elements and sharing experiences with friends will actually work somehow.

    But if it is all the worst things about the live service trend, I do hope it fails for the greater good, all due respect to the individuals who've done their best with it.

  • Just started Alan Wake 2 myself yesterday. In the past couple months I played the original's remaster and then replayed Control (including the DLC).

    This game's an absolute trip. I've said before that I wasn't terribly hooked by Alan Wake the first time I played it way back, but I fucking loved Control. The world building was fascinating, and there was some new, mind bending idea around every damn corner in the oldest house. But one of the best things it did was expand the world of Alan Wake in a way that benefited them both.

    I'm only a few hours in but Remedy is so far promising to deliver on the best of both worlds with renewed vigor. I am hooked this time.

  • Yeah, that's fair, I did not have that context originally. I should have quoted the article I linked, because the salient parts point out that it was strange the graffiti evoked the Israeli flag, which I had noticed originally:

    Also the message in the medium was confusing. Conceivably a blue Israeli flag, or what immediately evokes it, could be seen as a pro-Jewish sign. Surely any genuine antisemite would have found a clearer way of expressing their hate.

    I'm inclined to agree with the BBC's conclusion:

    As for the purpose of Operation Star of David, like all dezinformatsiya it seems to have been to sow confusion and anxiety. The fact that the symbol could be either pro- or anti-Israeli made it all the more interesting: that way both sides would be suspicious.

    I notice the Times of Israel doesn't consider this months-old information when continuing to reference it as evidence of anti-semitism.

  • All your sources rely on the same primary source: the interior ministry. And I don't see a breakdown of the acts. In a number of articles, graffiti of stars of David across buildings in France was categorized as anti-Semitic, which seems really weird to me because they weren't defaced or altered in any way, just stars of David. On its face I would think that was...pro-semitic.

    Either way, I'm not denying there has been an uptick in anti-Semitism and that any and all anti-semitism is indefensible. But there also seems to be a deliberate effort to embellish the narrative by treating anti-Israeli or pro-Paletinian acts as anti-Semitic. Then people react to that narrative with fear, and their fear is used to further credit the narrative.

    The insidious part is that these stories treat the narrative as support for Israel's ongoing aggression.

  • I feel for anyone who feels unsafe in their homes and communities. I can't imagine the weight of the decision to uproot yourself and your family to emigrate to another country for reasons beyond your control, especially discrimination.

    It's worth noting, though, that this article seemingly goes out of its way to obfuscate what qualifies as anti-semitic acts.

    "This kind of expression is no longer coming only from the extreme right, but also by the far left — and while it’s doubtful that it’s always antisemitic, anyone sensitive can feel that it’s never far away in certain discourse,” warns Wieviorka.

    Palestinian solidarity is not anti-semitism, and there are abundant indicators (from this article and its links) they're being conflated in France.

  • "Tracking protection" sounds more like "alternative tracking."

    Google's Privacy Sandbox initiative, just like its name implies, was designed to be an alternative to cookies that will allow advertisers to serve users ads while also protecting their privacy. It assigns users to groups according to their interests, based on their recent browsing activities, and advertisers can use that information to match them with relevant ads.

    Lot of time, money, and effort toward a moderate improvement rather than just not perceiving users as products. But...improvement is improvement.

    What's the downside?

  • Me? Not at all. I actually posted this out of concern because, as I've said elsewhere, I'm a Firefox user, and my layman's impression was that its reputation has been improving over the past couple years. I assumed its user base was doing the same as people grew increasingly concerned with Google's intentions.

    Apparently ZDnet has some reputational issues itself I was unaware of.

  • I don't think so. The article claims Firefox lost some of its lead developers to Google when it started developing Chrome and then took a long time to regain its footing around 2017. That sounds about right to my recollection. I had admittedly switched to Chrome myself for a while (I'm not terribly tech-savvy, maybe a little more than average) but switched back to Firefox last year. I am still pretty deeply embedded in the Google ecosystem though in other ways.

  • Haha yeah, when I say I had a cell phone, I mean that I was essentially reachable at all times. I didn't start using text messaging regularly until like...2009, and didn't use it for anything else until I got my first Droid a few years later.

    Fair point though, my response was very American-centric.

  • I prefer CHEAP, ACIDIC coffee because I did the pourover too fast on mediocre store-bought grounds that are too fine, LOL.

    😄. Get yourself a decent burr grinder, a French press, and some Aldi oat milk (if you don't want black) and you can make as good a cup of coffee as you can get at the best coffee shops.

  • As a relatively elder millennial (1987), I'd concede the title of last true pre-internet generation to Gen X. My family got AOL dial-up when I was in 6th grade, which was a little behind the curve compared to my peers, but not much. So I certainly lived through a seminal transition period as the internet developed and became...what it is today.

    But the hallmark experiences of the pre-internet times, payphones, paper maps, coordinating with others, I only did so in my limited capacity as a child. I had a cell phone by...10th grade, I could at least print out MapQuest directions, etc.

    I remember a lot, but didn't truly interact with most of it.