ComradeSalad @ ComradeSalad @lemmygrad.ml

Posts

7

Comments

439

Joined

3 yr. ago

Isn’t this because Kissinger pushed the US into allowing the PRC to claim the Nationalist Chinese’s seat on the UN Security Council, and getting the PRC recognized after the Sino-Soviet Split?

Also what do you expect from Putin?

It didn’t, this is a bug that affected a wide array of subreddits. It happened to me when trying to open “WhitePeopleTwitter”.

It should work again if you leave the site for a time.

Maybe that’s seen as to wordy for a title? Blank China Sea is a mouthful in what’s supposed to be a short sentence. I don’t know, I’m being generous.

But saying “Japan Island” instead of “Japanese Island” is comical.

Most republicans and democrats do. The entire 60+ voting base would implode and catastrophically collapse. It’s one of those things that politicians keep yelling about but would never dare doing.

Alright, I’m busy currently but I’ll be back to post sources. I can give you my word on that.

From what I’m hearing you have no historians or sources to back up your claim. I’m not sealioning you, because you made the claims initially. A lot of them too, with no backing.

If you made the claim, then the burden of proof is on you. You can’t just demand I post sources after posting none of your own, and making all your claims initially. Again, no sources.

Just one. One reputable historian with credible backing. One source. Anything.

You can’t make claims about Joseph, Tacitus, Suetonius and Pliny, and then say it’s “Very easy to refute them” then have no sources to back that up. Those sources are considered credible in large part, so you claiming they’re not doesn’t change much.

That isn’t what I asked. I asked if you had any sources for historians and sources that agree with what you’re saying.

You’re just repeating the same lines about Joseph and the scribes and calling them absurd, but that’s not sources. What evidence do you actually have?

You’re just making massive claims without any backing.

Would you mind linking any of your sources? For all intensive purposes the historicity of Jesus is a very much an open and shut case with the vast majority of historians agreeing that a radical reformer man who we now know as Jesus, existed and was baptized, and crucified. There are camps that say that he does not exist, but they are legitimately extremely small fringe outliers with little credibility.

Whether he was the messiah, a prophet, or the Son of God is an entirely different conversation, but he most certainly did exist as a historical figure.

A majority of Christian sects also reject a firm notion of Hell. Most view purgatory and salvation as the path that the soul takes.

Hell is simply where Satan resides, not some infinite torture chamber. Satan also has no control over Hell as Jesus willingly goes there and after a time, yoinks all the souls there up to Heaven without a problem during the ascension.

It kind of goes against the entire notion of indiscriminate forgiveness and salvation if you just got cast into hell and got stuck there.

Ah, you meant about the trinity, my bad. Just to be clear, that wasn’t what we’re discussing though, he’s arguing for the reformationist interpretation of Jesus being part of the Father himself, not them both being God.

It’s native to Europe yes, but that disregards the hundreds of millions of people they are orthodox Christians in Eastern Europe, the Balkans, and Central Europe. Along with the many many smaller sects that Catholicism attempted to destroy.

I’ll comment where I please, this is a public forum. Who are you to say where someone can post? You’ve been here for 4 days.

Also nice random copy and paste, that is entirely unrelated to what we are talking about, did you even read what you posted?

Why would you ever use chatgpt to try and argue for you 😭😂 do you realize how comically bad a lot of the information it just said is??? I kid you not, it just pulled several of those facts, quotes, and interpretations out of its ass lmao.

You’ve got to be kidding me 😂 that's before I even get to you just immediately insulting people for just pointing out that you’re saying things that are blatantly false.

Do you even know what the word narcissistic means? Or are all your comments just chatgpt fighting your battles for you?

That is not what the Nicene Creed says at all. It quite literally states that Christ is “begotten of God”, meaning that they are district separate entities in regards to the Father and Holy Spirit.

Again on top of being wrong, that is the still only interpretation and creed of a single sect of the Catholic Church. There have been many schisms over this interpretation and it is in no ways “canon” to Christianity, it is just the beliefs of a group of priests 300 years after the death of Christ and beginning of Christianity.

In fact, there is nothing in the Bible that states that Christ is “God the Son”, which was later hypothesized and added after the fact by Christian theology. The Trinity in itself is also an interpretation, not hard and fast canon.

That’s very reductive, Christianity doesn’t believe in a 3 in 1 God. Only certain sects believe in that, and those sects are relatively small, and mostly in the United States.

Religion was created by big paper in order to sell more copies of Holy Texts.

I don't know what to tell you, he is a known historical figure that was thoroughly documented and recorded by the Roman Empire. The Romans HATED Christianity and Jesus, so why would they support the existence of a fake person that they despise? Why would hundreds of documents, records, and testimonials from people across the Palestinian region and Roman Empire conspire to create Jesus?

Do you think Buddha and Mohammed never existed as well?

ISIS has had a strong presence in Central and Northern Africa, and along with this article, off the top of my head I can say that there is a current UN multinational operation that is still fighting encircled remnant ISIS forces in Mali, Niger, Nigeria, and Mozambique.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territory_of_the_Islamic_State#:~:text=As%20of%202022%2C%20most%20of,large%20swathes%20of%20eastern%20Mali.

Quote, "As of 2022, most of IS's African territory is confined to northeastern Nigeria and northern Mozambique, alongside large swathes of eastern Mali."

This is from 2015:

https://www.iiss.org/en/publications/strategic-comments/2015/isis-in-africa/

Imagine an FSB agent going to a bombed out village in sub-Saharan Africa, from which UN forces just bloodily expelled ISIS fighters, and that agent trying to convince the villagers to all get up and move to Britain because Russia wants them too.

Fun fact, the only reason there are historically a massive number of Jews in Hollywood is that Jews were prevented and banned from having almost any other job, much like African Americans, Polish, Italians, and Irish were as well, and Hollywood was considered laughable garbage and was one of the only places they could find employment for pennies.

Well… Hollywood wasn’t laughable for long and the rest is history.

Yes, because the end conclusion you’re supposed to reach with this train of thought is that Jews control everything and the highest positions of power.

It’s a misrepresentation of the situation in order to push genuine Anti-Semitic propaganda.