Communism is when no Internet discourse with fascists. I love it so much. It’s so fun seeing the degenerates of the Internet get turned to dust and not tolerated like they are on Reddit.
Its because of the Sino-Vietnamese War, and China propping up the Khmer Rouge as a counterbalance to South Vietnam. A problem that led to millions of refugees flooding Vietnam after China ceased funding them, and the CIA began arming Pol Pot, causing the Vietnamese army to be forced to intervene and stop the Cambodian Genocide. Ho Chi Min and the Vietnamese leadership were also far more receptive to the Soviet Union and traditional Marxism-Leninism, then Maoism, so the ideological divide even between two socialist nations was stark.
This is also an aside, but to a lesser extent, China's forays into the South China Sea has ticked off the Vietnamese, and rightfully so, though the ones that talk loudly about this are usually the nationalist and pro-west elements. However, even the hardliner socialist elements are worried about encroachment onto Vietnam's sovereignty as a nation, given that China did already go as far as initiating a hot war and invasion in the past; along with funding counter-revolutionaries to destabilize the Vietnamese government
These things have regretfully pushed Vietnam towards the US, because they have come to view their northern neighbor with suspicion and as a greater threat then the one currently posed by the US. Whether this is a good choice is obvious, but that is regretfully the situation.
The “Divide Africa” category is bit disingenuous. Essentially the only parties that participated were the British, Germans, French, Spanish, and Portuguese,
Austria-Hungary, Russia, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden/Norway, the Ottoman Empire, and the United States all send dignitaries, but it was essentially just for observer status, since none of those countries established any African holdings, or made territorial claims at the conference.
However, those countries still participated under the banner of their respective colonial empires, with the US for example sitting under the title “American colonial empire”. And were complicit in what happened.
Where did I say that they were being a Nazi sympathizer? I asked if they considered propaganda against Germans targeted to children to be in the same category as reactionary anti-communist propaganda.
I never twisted your words, or called you a nazi sympathizer. I also never said that Palestine is wrong for doing what you're talking about.
The only think I was confused about was the inclusion of the Donald Duck skit, as when I first saw the post I interpreted the message as "if propaganda towards children bad, then why does America do it?" However the inclusion of a anti-nazi WW2 animation seemed out of place and strange, because it can be argued that it is a good piece of propaganda for a good goal, unlike the deranged reactionary messages in the other content.
The choice seemed out of place among the reactionary content you chose for the other examples. I never said they were correct.
Wasn’t it called the “Houthi Movement” primarily because the majority of the main leaders were from the Houthi tribe, with many having the al-Houthi surname?
Doubt Libs would care to make the distinction anyways.
Again, everything you are saying is completely devoid of reality and the exactly opposite of what the Minoborony and army themselves have stated. Are you Putin himself? Are you telling me you know more then the Russian Ministry of Defense?
“Our nameless communist newspapers”? Ok? That’s the best source you have?
I was in the Gomel Oblast visiting family as the assault itself was underway. A terrible place to be in light of the war, but guess who you got to meet a lot of in a Belarusian border city? Soldiers on leave. Guess what were the things they discussed and the gruesome details they shared? Yes they had seized ground, but they were never supposed to meaningfully hold it, only draw Ukrainian units away from the front line, and they could not sustain their losses or hold their positions with their current supply lines and unit strength, so they were pulling back to redeploy to Donetsk. They were never supposed to achieve “victory” in Kiev.
Guess what that’s identical to? The Russian MOD outline for why the drive in Kiev was planned! Who would have thought?
But I’m sorry Marshal Zhukov. You know best, and you are a military genius when it comes to this.
ComradeSalad @ ComradeSalad @lemmygrad.ml Posts 7Comments 439Joined 3 yr. ago
I’ve actually been able to find four total!