Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CM
Posts
2
Comments
1,844
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The irony here. You've made zero argument other than "not uh!" and expect me to keep repeating what I've already stated in good faith. I focused on social media companies because that's what you had an issue with. Nobody disputes whether companies like Microsoft, SpaceX, Intel, and Apple are tech companies. The dispute here is whether Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, etc are really tech companies and more specifically whether any news surrounding these companies should be considered tech news (which you've already been given examples of) rather than just news about their actual tech products.

    So social media companies don’t apply scientific knowledge? Are you serious?

    Nobody stated that.

    Once again I'll ask you to define what you think social media companies are and how that definition doesn't include every other company with a web presence. Are you or are you not able to do that?

  • Try the "combing" setting "with infill" should drag the nozzle across the infill to wipe any strings away. Be careful with this though as I've had it knock prints loose from the bed. This print looks to have a large adhesion surface so it shouldn't be an issue.

  • I said the code is the tech and then gave examples of what isn't tech. What else do you want? The dictionary definition is

    the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry.

    which points even further away from social media being tech IMO.

  • Trump and Musk are pieces of shit but that guy has a point. Try getting into an EV or autonomous driving discussion where you bring up a Tesla without hearing ad hominems about you "sucking Elons dick" or having to hear the content of every recent tweet he's made when all you've done is strictly talk about the technology. These people are just as obsessed with the guy as the fanboys are.

  • The product itself (the code) may be considered tech but the company's/employee's/executive's business/personal/anything outside of the product dealings shouldn't be. If running a website makes any information related to you tech related then literally every company is a tech company. Meta's stock price dropping because Zuckerbot farted in a kindergarten classroom isn't anything tech related. Subscription fees being added or increased isn't tech related.

    How would you define tech with regards to social media and how does that definition not include any other company running a website that you can interact with?