Clinicallydepressedpoochie @ Clinicallydepressedpoochie @lemmy.world

Posts

314

Comments

2,802

Joined

1 yr. ago

My eyes are pretty dead but I think its just the hope in me that's died from having from watching trump come to power in america.

Something tells me it dont taste like soup

You dont have to bring them to court with it for it to be useful. It could be used to target individuals then they use more conventional methods of evidence gathering to arrest.

I would guess they arent currently doing it enmasse because that doesnt sound useful either. I would say, solely on a vibes based level its been done by US intelligence. Its really not so different than a wiretap.

And its likely it will never go away

Piss off

Bugs crawling on the dirty gross ground, hell no. Bugs pulled out of salty water, im in.

You re-read an re-read again. Either be direct or just go away and stop flagulating yourself.

BTW, your nobels in the mail.

Way to avoid my question for the umpteenth time

What best describes this curve.

Real world data does not behave according to a precieved underlying function. The functions we use are only useful as models. Models are approximations.

Alright, I have to say it. This post was satire. Carry on.

I am glad everyone does see through the ruse. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise, the guy is a NAZI.

Without the "knee" of the curve there is no exponential growth.

What best describes this curve

Edit: Maybe I have it wrong. From now on I will only model data as exponential functions because they are potentially exponential and the data set is just incomplete.

Its all over for me now!

No! He big mad at trump noaw.

Lol

Well there it is

it doesn’t suddenly “become” exponential at the rapid increase, it’s exponential the whole time.

What type of growth would you use to describe the advancement of AI?

Uh, no. That's too personal. Either you take what im saying at face value or you dont. If there was a time I could sit down and pass a heat and mass transfer exam that is long passed.

Its a thing you do to get into higher level classes. Then never think about again.

Sigh

So your claim is that curve was generated using an exponential function?

I concede, that appears to be the case.

Now this one

What function generated this curve?

Which case is that? Have we moved goal posts or are you claiming this line:

Was generated using the function y=exp(x)?

That's the curve of the line?

Your data as in you generated it? Or that's the function that fits the curve shown in the graph?