Ciralinde @ Ciralinde @lemmynsfw.com

Posts

1

Comments

11

Joined

11 mo. ago

Also gamers make the best draft dodgers. Gaming totally did help with not leaving my appartment for a year.

I'm a bit confused about this, isn't the whole lgbtq movement advocating for the distinction between terms "sex" and "gender" exactly the same way as those quotes do? Or do lgbtq people advocate for equating "sex" to "gender"? Honestly, this whole thing is always a huge mindfuck to try to comprehend.

Was searching something and stumbled upon this old piece from 2004 about journalism in context of America:

The press, to a large extent, owes its origins to the party pamphlets of the 17th and 18th centuries, and it is good to see that they are sticking to the traditions that made the term “honest journalist” a contradiction in terms. The only question is, “Who pays?” In the heroic days of journalism, dishonest editors like Bennet, Pulitzer, and Hearst paid their writers to go out and get stories that would sell papers, and the journalist guns they hired would have cheerfully sold out either employer or party in order to gain fame and fortune—though not in that order.

“Honest journalist” and “a free press” are not only contradictions in terms; they are mutually exclusive, because the nearest thing to an honest journalist is a man who will sell himself to the highest bidder. Once a man has made enough money—that is, supposing he is a man—he can devote himself to telling the lies he really believes in.

So the question is not, as our colleague Humpty Dumpty never ceases to remind us, whether one has the right to “make words mean so many different things”—that is, to mislead and deceive the public. “The question is which is to be master—that is all.” In other words, since we must assume that journalists will twist and contort both fact and language in order to maintain the cause taken up by their master, the only question in American journalism worth debating (though even talking about the subject can sour the digestion of a philanthropic optimist) is who shall be the masters of the servile press—that is all.

The left generally answers, “the people,” by which they mean the government, by which they mean themselves and their leftist colleagues who end up as the cultural commissars who run the NEA, the DOE, the NEH, and every other set of unpalatable acronyms that, when reassembled, spell out the ignorance and stupidity which are the fate of the American people. The so-called right (though there is not now and never has been a genuine American right that amounted to anything) answers, “the individual,” by which they mean media corporations, by which they mean monopolies like Disney/ABC-Time Warner, by which they mean themselves and their friends who run the monopolies that spell the doom of the American mind and American freedom.

I don't think this exists, and I'm not sure I'd believe this ever existed anywhere at all. Any journalism is driven by certain political interests and every social media is heavily brigaded hivemind like r/worldnews.

Hell yeah! Make Fortnite Great Again! Those little bastards and obvious catering to them from Epic Games totally ruined this game!

Do you consider the right to give up a basic human right? I do. Military service should never be mandatory. Also, the whole concept of nation-states is obsolete and harmful and humanity should try to move to stateless/borderless forms of society.

So, I don’t know if you’re aware – and your client may work differently, if you’re not using a browser – but in the Lemmy Web UI, you can expand images that are directly posted by clicking on them.

The main difference is images on imageboards are posted not only as topic or for sharing content, but WITH EVERY MESSAGE in discussions just for fun and for the sake of it. So a person might start posting every message in a thread with a new image of his anime waifu, even though the discussion might be about linux kernel or whatever. This format of conversation is already a culture in itself, but there's more to imageboards. You just have to try both to feel the difference in vibe.

https://imageboards.net/

Thanks! I've been digging myself and somehow this is first time I see this particular catalogue! I wonder what's wrong with my google-fu.

I actually would be interested to try a non-anonymous imageboard, but I've never seen one. What I'm seeking there is not anonymity but the way it's structured: linear chatty threads with easily expandable images/videos attached to posts, references to other messages using post number backlinks that show referenced post on hover. The way redditlikes feel with this tree-like structure is totally different and it breeds different types of discussions and totally different vibe. This works better for stricter, more formal, more serious discussions, while imageboards work better for chaotic fun chatty threads with incidental RP and whatnot. In a way, imageboards feel more like chat, but turn-based one instead of real-time, and it's really quite unique vibe.

This platform is good, but I don't see this format as interchangeable with imageboards. For me redditlikes and imageboards are totally different beasts. And even within imageboards, there are actually 2 totally different non-interchangeable types: those like 4chan, a format I'm talking about, the one most often associated with the word "imageboard", and those like gelbooru, which are closer to stuff like pinterest. Still thanks for letting me know about mbin/piefed because I wasn't aware of those.

NEET draft dodger type. I prioritize life and wellbeing over nation-state things. Living off savings, never leaving apartment, and waiting for opportunity to sneak out of country after ceasefire or defeat.

Average penis size in Ecuador 🍆