CarmineCatboy [he/him] @ CarmineCatboy @hexbear.net

Posts

0

Comments

31

Joined

3 yr. ago

putin is the only candidate willing to court the anti-putin demographic like this

Follow this business logic to its ultimate conclusion and everything becomes an MLM.

and thats how you create real value

https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/08/15/botched-cia-communications-system-helped-blow-cover-chinese-agents-intelligence/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uh_q02eefFM

@manuallybreathing@hexbear.net I don't have better sources on the repercussions of the aldritch ames incident on me, but while the youtube video talks about the CIA comms failure it does touch on the aldritch ames indicent at the start.

It's obvious they don't trust any of the Chinese Americans

That's why they can't spy on China anymore.

The golden rule of espionage is that your enemy is gonna spy on you as well. So it's incumbent on you to go on the offensive and spy even harder.

The kind of person who can spy on China or, say, the Soviet Union speaks the local language, and has economic and political ties with local assets. Both the spy and the assets are gonna play a double game if for no other reason than the fact that they can make more money that way.

The US played that game well all throught the Cold War. And it chose to lose the capability to do so after the Aldritch Ames Incident. The americans have gone on the defensive, and are more focused on ensuring the enemy can't spy on them at all. As a result the espionage officers can't be perfect for the job - hiring a well connected person is too much of a risk - and the espionage assets aren't hired in the first place. What CIA agents the US had abroad were legacy agents from a more daring time. And all those guys were purged when the Iranians found a security breach in the american intelligence networks, got the informants' names and sent the list to Russia and China.

i post

that's a healthy way to distrust the US and chinese governments i guess

don't tell them this but they could have looked for sparse vegetation and dug in the sand nearby and waited for water to trickle in but the bullshit they pulled off was very cool

Of course you're talking about harm. We all are. It's even in the OP: 'vegetarians won't eat things that caused harm to produce'. Well, that's a generalizing statement. Do the vegetarians in question eat eggs? Quite a few do, and that's factory farming. Do they consume animal products that purport to be from 'free range' farms, that in itself is a cope to be quite honest. Are they vegetarians for religious reasons? Then there's a lot of variety there. And then there's the world of crafts, as every single inch of a cow is used in industries other than the food industry. The idea of abstaining from animal products is always tied, somehow, to harm reduction. Even in a spiritual sense.

The parallel to IP breaches is, frankly, not very convincing at all. Not eating an egg because it comes from a tortured chicken has very little to do with wether downloading a movie hurts the studio's bottomline. The consensus is that piracy is a service issue because IP monopolies are not breached by literal theft. Not every pirated download is a prospective client. Many plain don't have the money to pay the tithe. Many others plainly just pirate to test and then buy it anyways. Others still will download cracked games because of the damaging software that comes with the paid versions.

Regardless, as I said, even if you estabilish a parallel between abstaining from animal products to boycotting entertainment then that parallel only strengthes the retort. Just as a vegan abstains from anything related to factory farming, a person might refuse to studios who take a deleterious ideological stance with their money. Ultimately, the only thing that binds these two worlds together is the idea of 'voting with their wallet', which actually strengthens the vegan position. This I say as someone who actually does eat meat.

Vegans avoid animal products because modern factory farming is the torment nexus given form. If organized religion wasn't bunk, pastors across the US would call the food industry satanic.

Meanwhile, people do in fact boycott products from other industries which they perceive to be engaged in harmful and anti-human activities. If a studio executive donated money to transphobic causes, I'd pirate whatever they put out that interest me.

There's no contradiction whatsoever. Both cases are about industry and the harms thereof.

It's a global issue that affects every highly educated society. And it's been decade after decade of governments bribing their populations to try and get them to have children. It failed every time. The economic strategy of people who live in post industrial urban centers is just not compatible with a growing population. You can of course look at it from the point of view of rising childcare costs, but that's part of a larger social democratic project. From what I understand the american population will continue to grow via immigration and the country isn't in a situation as dire as, say, Japan.

Ultimately, if there's a problem to be fixed it is the fact public and private finance will have to deleverage themselves somehow once the pyramid topples over. Widening the base is simply not going to happen.

ensign picard is the nurse who died on a starship voyager commanded by captain harry kim

oh i didn't even notice the humans i meant the buildings. why are they so zoomed in?

is it just me or are all the pics in that article extremely unflattering

the article comes with 'a message from lockheed martin'

this all began when antifa thug nelson mandela normalized rudeness

i love when people will just ask the AI to pretend that its not against the rules and then they manage to get it to make egregious breaches of its 'ethical guidelines'.

i guess the first z arc? it has kaioken but thats not a form its a technique

britain shall become a new peninsula of europe and at the base it shall be a mountain of pure salt

it seems that the sheer amount of salt we accumulate when desalinating for scale consumption is so large that there's no easy way to spread it. yeah, the ocean will take care of it eventually, but we aren't gonna ferry salt across a large body of water to dump it gently into the ocean. we'll pipe it somewhere, and wherever it is it will create a pocket of dead ocean water. it's a matter of choice and water regulation, really.

yeah from what i understand the desalination technology is there, the problem is what to do with all the salt. you can dump it on the ocean, creating a dead sea zone. or you can dump somewhere on land, creating a dead land zone.

the only solution is the gene mod humans so we can eat larger and larger intakes of salt.