CallumWells @ CallumWells @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

224

Joined

2 yr. ago

I find that struggling to be on time is fine, actually not being on time is disrespectful of my time. In modern society we have so many options available to make sure we can keep on time. Set up alarms, time how long it takes you to get dressed and out the door, time how long it takes you to get somewhere, set alarms to keep you on time based on what you've actually measured, not what one "feels" is enough time.

Personally I'm more often than not 5+ minutes early; I can always wait a little more before I go in or something, it's often harder to "just get there faster".

BTW; if someone is late because of something outside their control that's fine; just make sure to inform me ASAP.

You say uTorrent, I say µTorrent. We are not the same ;P

EDIT: I get µ from [Ctrl] + [Alt] + [m] (or [Alt Gr] + [m]), in case someone wants to be able to do it easily themselves. It might be different on your keyboard...

You're someone ;P

I always find it funny how aliens only go to USA...

Wasn't there extensions to do this to reddit and other sites? If so then you can just make your own extension to do that. Problem solved.

Also writing documentation in-code like JavaDoc or equivalents has always seemed great for me. Then you can have your toolchain generate the written documentation directly from that, and it can be updated easily based on what's actually documented in the code (but that does require that people keep that updated)

I think it's meant to be role play of an erotic nature.

I find it hard on my eyes, but I think it's great that it exists for people to choose, especially for those who actually get a benefit from it. The best thing is to let people choose their own fonts everywhere. Yes, it might clash with some corporate profile, but fuck'em.

c/whoosh ?

You're the builder, and thus the one who can choose to put a maze there or not.

There's always possibilities to make things safer, but that often comes at a cost of features, features that many web developers (or possibly more likely their employer) would hate to see removed or be inaccessible. At least Firefox has done some great things to keep websites separated so a tracking cookie from tracking service A on site B and site C doesn't quite get the same possibilities to track you as before (IIRC, take it with a grain of salt). But in general I would lean more towards JS sort of being inherently "unsafe".

You can always make yourself a lot more secure by browsing the web through a browser confined to a virtual machine, but most people won't do that. And as with IOT, the S in World Wide Web stands for Security.

Awooooo!

I don't think there are any witches doing anything in a congress.

You explicitly state "render to image".

Having technology requiring at least some understanding of it is a great filter for the internet. But that's gone.

And fuck AMP, it's a fucking travesty.

No, they didn't mean to render it all as an image, but that everything comes from the content server you're getting the content you want from and thus the ads should be indistinguishable from content. I don't understand how you could misunderstand it to such a degree as to think they meant to render it all as an image.

My books aren't digital at all. How can they have DRM?

The only acceptable browser would obviously be ones that restrict that access, how else are they going to force people to see all their ads?

so people will actually not their books

What?