Buddahriffic @ Buddahriffic @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

3,287

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

It's been on this path since at least hubble. Though it might have accelerated.

The universe spontaneously popped into exitence in the current state it's in when you're reading this, the only things that exist are what's in your line of sight, all the memories are made up, and it'll shortly pop back out of existence only to return a few billion years or femtoseconds later with a new line of sight and memories, along with something to let you know what's really happening but with enough plausible deniability that you'll laugh and try to move on before popping back out of existence.

This is your eternal punishment for something you can't even remember, or can't verify even if you do remember.

How would you even know this? you might wonder with a hint of uncertain dread, but the truth is I don't know anything because I don't even exist. It's all you: punisher, punishee, neutral observer, entertained by this meaningless repetition that bored you out of your mind lol.

Or shall we let this one play out a bit longer?

"Luckily there was a loophole in those rules that I (omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient) made."

If that doesn't scream, "made up by the clerics trying to avoid contradicting each other and bringing the whole house of lying cards down as they went", just keep sending money to your church. Because if a god needs anything, it's obviously worldly riches and unquestioning loyalty. We need these churches to impress everyone with the power of our god, but he's sleepy after making it all and throwing tantrums bigger than we can imagine because people were acting like the way he made them capable of acting, like cartoon villains in some cases, like a whole city whose first reaction to seeing an angel was "Let's all rape it!" So that's why you need to send your money without any questions!

I'm convinced the superstition is a misunderstanding over time of things that were, on their own, bad luck. Salt used to be expensive, so spilling some was bad luck because you would have rather kept it all for use instead of wasting it.

Mirrors would have also been expensive, especially when they needed to be transported before the time of smooth suspensions. The whole 7 years thing could be from it taking around 7 years for one particular broken mirror to be replaced.

Or the ones that invite accidents, like walking under a ladder (which usually implies someone is working at the top and might drop something, so odds of death are a bit higher under ladders). Or opening an umbrella indoors, where things are more crowded and you might injure someone or break something.

Though the black cat one is probably just racism.

Anyways, I bet that's where they started and then humans being kinda (or very, depending on the circumstances) stupid and liking jumping on bandwagons they don't always understand to fit in, left us with some people thinking those things cause ghosts to haunt you or whatever dumb shit superstitious people think happens.

Though I do think it is a bit wasteful to just dump salt out on the ground.

It's not even the squirrels you need to worry about directly, it's any fleas or biting bugs (can ticks carry it?) that have recently bitten one of those squirrels.

There was a series on Netflix that used this. It was alright though probably got cancelled. Can't remember the name of it.

He was getting paid peanuts for designing and building an essential system for the running of the park all on his own, working for a guy that constantly bragged about sparing no expense.

IIRC the only interaction between Hammond and Nerdy went something like "you should have negotiated a better contract! Stfu gbtw", which can pretty much sum up the whole wealth divide between the owners who gain most of the benefit and the workers who actually do the things under capitalism. Except if they aren't getting the better of everyone on average, they just shut the whole thing down or find others that they do get the better of.

My mom would always tell me that I wouldn't like the baker's chocolate she would use in baking when I'd ask to try a piece.

Then, one day, she decided to just let me try it, probably expecting me to be grossed out or something. But I love dark chocolate and liked it anyways, even if it didn't exactly match my expectations at the time.

Yeah, the showing off is what I was getting at. The first experiment seemed more like an experiment and an accident but the demonstrations with the screwdriver seemed more like someone doing pull-ups over a fatal drop just to show how badass they are and accidentally landing on other people on the bottom when he slipped.

Thanks for the in depth response though, this gives more context to this than I've had before.

And just guessing on the other two attitudes before looking anything up (haha maybe wanting to challenge my intuition like this instead of just looking it up is one), one is probably related to laziness (eg assuming something is fine and doesn't need to be checked when going through the pre flight checklist). And maybe the other is being too trusting or not assertive enough (eg colleague says something is OK, you don't fully believe them but don't challenge them on it). Am I close?

What was the point of these approaching criticality experiments anyways?

Has it ever been proven in any of the shows that the transporter didn't kill everyone that used it and just made such prefect copies that no one realized?

Like it created an extra copy of Riker and there was the tragedy of Tuvix. Though I'd say the former is evidence that it is new copies but the latter might be evidence against it, since they each had memories of their time merged when they separated. Actually, that whole incident kinda brings into question what's going on for a transporter to accidentally merge two people and not in a "horrible teleportation into a wall accident" way and then somehow de-merge them.

Not in Canada. Unless they want to go out of business.

Rick rolls saved the internet from random goatse/tubgurl/2girls1cup.

So... Did you guys eventually get the kinky glassware you ordered and did they make you return the chemistry glassware they accidentally sent?

No, it wouldn't be safe to say that because if the next guy just prints money like it's 2020, inflation will get crazy again and that cash you saved will be worth less than the stock you got rid of.

To be fait, a lot of sci fi does involve very advanced computing, like HAL in 2001.

It is that simple but it isn't easy. It's like finding enlightenment from Buddhist parables. They don't all click the same for everyone. Once they click, it can seem obvious, but before that, they can seem meaningless, trite, or misleading.

From my pov, the image is accurate but not the clearest. It can only get you part of the way and only if it resonates with you. It doesn't surprise me that it generates cynicism similar to the "gee thanks, I'm cured" responses to mental health advice.

My interpretation of the message in the meme isn't so much a "present vs future thinking" as it is a "you don't need to search for happiness because your brain determines your mood, not outside factors." I'm not saying you should just ignore your issues (which would make things more difficult over time), but that you can be happy despite them. Happiness isn't a goal, it's a state of mind.

As for the millionaire example, that they wouldn't be living paycheck to paycheck is the whole point. It was intended to frame happiness/unhappiness in a different context that was easy to understand (he lost money he had spent a lot of time getting) but was still left in a position that most would be happy to find themselves in, but instead he's probably miserable about it.

My line of thought for this is that stressing about whether you'll have enough money to cover rent won't make it any easier to cover rent. Happiness is more about mindset than circumstances. It is easier said than done, for sure, but if one needed to have 0 problems to be happy, there wouldn't be many happy people.

Consider a millionaire who checks the markets one day only to realize their portfolio has dropped by 30% wiping out all of their gains for the past two years and leaving them with only 3 million. They'd probably not be very happy with that, despite still being in a position that many would trade everything to be in.

I'd even go so far as saying that fraud is pretty rampant in all levels of society.