Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BR
Posts
0
Comments
314
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Highly unlikely, the melting point of those materials is higher than most house fires. The boiling point would be even higher. Even then, the amount of beryllium in all of those gems combined wouldnt be enough to significantly impact the air quality.

  • I should have been more clear, they can no longer implement temporary injunctions. These were used by judges to stop further action while the case was proceeding in their court.

    Once the trial has been conducted and the judge makes a decision, they can decide that a nationwide law is not valid and therefore stop it's application everywhere.

  • Isn't this a bit like saying that NASA has Mars in its sights, not New Jersey? Sure there are more people in NJ, but arriving in NJ isn't really an accomplishment. Likewise, being able to beat a piece of hardware that was out of date when it was first announced over a year ago (switch 2) obviously isn't their goal. Additionally, Valve already has superior hardware and distribution, so they are clearly the competitor to beat.

  • Your phone's camera should be able to "see" the IR from security cameras and IR remotes. That can give you a sense for home much and in what direction they emit.

    The sensitivities will be different, your phone should still help you some.

  • For gifts specifically, the giver is supposed to pay the tax.

    Everything else you listed is taxed as income (with different rules depending on the source) just like you said. You could also add inheritance (unless special loopholes are used) and proceeds from the sale of illegal narcotics.

  • "Republicans have argued that the rules effectively dictate standards for the whole country, imposing what would eventually be a nationwide electric vehicle mandate."

    They always get so close to understanding how awful they are themselves. Makes you think they aren't arguing in good faith.

  • Ahh, they are hard to find on mobile in vertical. The filtering section is scrollable, but it's not obvious that that frame can scroll independently of the entire page, so didn't see them the first time.

  • The author of this is really twisting the story in his own favor. He leaves out the part where he launched public personal attacks against other faculty and students.

    His department did try to work with him so that he could teach his class (which was completely outside his field of expertise, and is therefore against the general policies). They wanted him to co-teach with someone with knowledge in the field, but at that point he had completely ostricisized himself and no one wanted to work with him.

    This is absolutely a situation where someone fucked around with a loaded gun, shot themselves in the foot and is now mad at everyone else because they didn't help him shoot someone else.

  • "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, ..."

    And

    "... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

    Let's see how SCOTUS tries to get around these