Well sorry, I suppose I didn't need to call your comment asinine.
But this is not an unknown issue. Multitudes of testing throughout decades have shown there is no toxicity for the levels that are in water. The county you're living in most likely has their own case study available for you to read.
I can look at issues without prejudice, but valid issues. This is not one of those.
Also, if you're talking about toxicity due to dose, you'll die from water consumption before you'd get anywhere near toxic levels of fluoride. Don't even think about any sort of medication you're taking, it's also probably more toxic than the levels of fluoride in water.
Again, sorry. I don't want to be mean, but there's so much information out there opposing your comment. I'd happily point you in the right direction if you'd like to read up on the plethora of resources stating it's not toxic, and at least somewhat beneficial.
No. It can't be said for fluoride. Lead is known to be extremely toxic. We've seen what it does. Fluoride in water is not toxic, which has been shown multiple times.
Not that it's really an issue since water used in drug formulations are not treated with chloramine disinfectants. But usage of those disinfectants can contribute to nitrosamines in some drugs, which no one wants.
Incredibly unlikely (impossible?) taking a drug with chloramine disinfected water, don't worry.
For the record, I'm not American. I have also tried my best to keep myself out of reading anything related to such things related to the recently elected "president" and his running mate. Although, I wouldn't be surprised if you're correct. I hope it's not the case, but I'm not holding my breath.
I think you're right.