BougieBirdie @ Bougie_Birdie @lemmy.blahaj.zone

Sometimes I make video games

---

Read more

Posts

4

Comments

669

Joined

2 yr. ago

Zombii looks like my void. Then again, I suppose most voids look like my void

Can you tell me more about gall fruit? I've never heard of it, but I guess it must be good for cats if you put it in their toys

Is the idea here direct democracy, but instead of personally voting on each issue, you have a digital assistant cast your ballot?

I propose "direct technocracy" as the term. I also welcome the boom in dystopic cyberpunk media if this gets considered.

Ultimately, I think the problem would be that people are going to think even less about politics if they could abstract it away. It might seem counterintuitive since Lemmy is full of politics, but we're hardly representative of the larger demographic and apathy rules the political landscape.

There's also a bunch of issues with making sure that your AI would actually respect your wishes and vote accordingly. It sounds like we're thinking of a hypothetical AI that's easier to tune and doesn't have the problems of today's AI. But if we're talking hypotheticals that have somehow fixed implementation problems, then I'd rather have a good, safe, and secure way to just vote online.

I think anybody who says they haven't questioned their sexuality is likely to be lying. Then again, we're all biased by our lived experiences and I've spent a lot of time questioning things, so I could be projecting.

At the end of the day I want to say to like who you like. What happens between consenting adults is nobody's business but theirs, and the sun isn't going to implode because you dig on a girly dude.

Hell, you don't even need to put a label on your sexuality. Or your gender for that matter, although that's a whole different can of worms.

Depending on where you are, you might be growing up alongside harmful anti-queer rhetoric. That kind of thing makes it very difficult for a lot of people to admit their sexuality with any degree of nuance. People living in fear will lie to their friends, family, and selves in order to hide their attractions. It's sad and harmful, and it also makes it difficult for some people to be open about sometimes liking a person that is outside what they believe society expects of them.

You guys should get coffee or something. I wouldn't pass up on a chance to learn more about myself

I'm not sure if this question is positing that women aren't stimulated by porn visually, or if it's using porn as an example of something to be stimulated visually by.

My wife likes cartoons and has a diploma in animation. Her class was like 80% female. Animation is pretty much by definition visual stimulation.

But if we're talking exclusively about eroticism, there's female directors making porn for the female eye too. IMO it relies less on the gonzo fake shit and tropes of mainstream porn too, so it might actually be healthier to consume (note: not a sexologist)

Either way, I'm not sure that this divide between men and women exists where you think it does

I agree that the behavior of these companies to hook their users using the darkest psychological patterns is disgusting. It doesn't become any less disgusting once the user turns 17 though, and no framework is in place to prevent those teens from falling prey once they gain access.

Even if we all agree that a ban is warranted, my stance is that a ban alone isn't enough. It needs to be accompanied by education and harm reduction.

And it needs to be honest, scientific, and good-faith education. We don't need another DARE program demonizing something because misinformation can be more harmful than failure to educate

How does someone advance to "rationally thinking" without receiving education?

I don't disagree that habits picked up in childhood are more difficult to break. But I don't think it's a problem exclusively for children either.

Many of us are growing up with parents and grandparents with brainrot. And sure, maybe they would have been more susceptible as kids if the technology existed then. But we all would be better off with decent digital and media literacy.

Plus, who's giving the kids these devices anyway? It's usually the parents - who have been raised not to talk to strangers- giving their kids unfettered access to all the strangers of the world

In English we have an idiom, "same shit, different day," which means dealing with the same sort of unpleasant task until it's routine. Do you have something similar?

This Hamburg court thing sounds like something I'd call "same shit, different pay," which would be like when you have an issue with your boss so you appeal to their boss, and find out that they're just as bad except they're higher in the organization.

I don't think a ban is coming at the issue from the right angle. Social media misuse is fundamentally a problem of addiction, and we have a checkered past of causing harm when banning things. For a historical analogue, look at the Prohibition era of the United States.

Ultimately, bans for these things don't work because people will get around it anyway. And that's exactly when dangerous things happen. Using the Prohibition example again, people poisoned themselves trying to make illegal hooch because they were determined to drink anyway.

I think education is the answer. And I mean honestly, isn't education always the answer? But you've got to educate your kids about the content they're using. We've got to educate the parents about the dangerousness of unlimited access to screens. If people don't understand the danger, then they don't recognize the danger, and suddenly they've stumbled on danger.

I'm sure everyone has heard a story about a straight-laced kid who grew up with strict parents, and then at the first opportunity to party in college goes on a bender to destroy their life. Those kids' parents really did them a disservice by not preparing them for reality. If their only education on drugs and alcohol is "don't do them," then the child isn't really aware of the risks. They just see that everyone else is doing them and having fun, and then they go off the deep end before they realize how bad things are getting.

Social media's the same thing. The day your kid turns seventeen they'll have every chance to succumb to brainrot on their own volition. Without being informed of how or why that happens, there's nothing stopping someone from falling into any internet rabbithole.

I learned it by watching you, dad!

Every other skilled trade just says "Fast, Right, or Cheap: pick two."

It's not my fault if they always pick fast and cheap

"You are on this council, but we do not grant you the rank of master."

"What? How can you do this? This is outrageous! It's unfair! How can you be on the council and not be a master?"

"Take the fucking seat, Skywalker."

G..E..T....O...U...T...

Get out of what? Get outside? Have you been cooped up too much? Get out of your comfort zone? Have you been stagnating?

(jk I'm not fluent in Morse. For that you'll need a radio operator or an exorcist)

I don't know, I guess I must have forgot

All costs are passed onto the consumer. Heaven forbid the line doesn't go up

GROND!

Friendly reminder to DMs that Counter Spell is a reaction, so after your fireball gets counter-counter-counter-counter-counter-counter-counterspelled you can just have some other mook cast another.

I mean, you shouldn't counter-counter-counter-counterspell if you can help it. But having multiple casters in an encounter adds some more strategizing, especially if you have a scenario where a player might want to hold their reaction for something else.

I feel like "don't laugh at your own jokes" is a piece of ancient wisdom from the entertainment industry.

Like, if you're a performer and you're laughing so hard that you can't get the punchline out, then it prevents people from actually hearing the joke.

When you consider that performers in traditional media have a limited time slot to work in, then taking a break to laugh could be considered a waste or unprofessional.

I don't think that long-format content has the same problem. If you're making an online video or a podcast then you're not limited by time. Authenticity is more important than fitting into a five minute set

Yeah, I'm not sure this is the generational thing that the author is trying to make it out to be. It seems to me like one of those things that leans on personal preference.

The author's sample for the behavior of generations is a few anecdotes from personal friends. How many friends does a person have, 3, or 30, or 300? That means n is pretty small when there's something like 3 billion mellenials

Initial attempts to search for this were frustrated because my search engine kept trying to find rhymes for "FOSS" or "Open Source"

However, I did find an app with credits that showed what libraries it used.

In particular, this one might be up your alley: Carnegie Mellon pronouncing dictionary. It looks like you'd still have to combine it with an existing dictionary in order to find the rhymes, but at least you can get the pronunciation

I don't understand, you didn't get the jokes? I forwarded the chain letter to everyone