Not owning a house is slavery? What country today or ever in history had guaranteed a home?
Ideally, land should not be owned. Land is kept from pure ownership in progressive states through property taxes. You are in effect only renting the land from the state but keep the right to not be removed and the right to sell it.
Is there any country now or ever where you didn't have to work until you died (on average) with a lottery (birth, talent, luck) that lets you be free by living off the work of everyone else?
Getting to choose your work has always been the only fredom.
I have/had ( bought for friends or myself) Anbernic 35xx, 35xx SP, rg cube x, 351 mp.
There are so many variations that it's really personal preference. Like are you doing 16:9 games or 4:3? I wanted something for old arcades like pacman and space invaders so I got the cube. That screen ratio also happens to work well for Gameboy
Yeah Miyoo only makes a vertical and a flip. Retro game corps says the flip has some quality control problems.
I have a RP3+ but after using it a while, Android is too much of a hassle.
Miyoo Mini or Anbernic equivalents running Linux are so much easier. There's no setup- just put your roms in a folder and go. I spent hours on the Retroid just trying to to get launchers looking nice and emulators configured.
But the critical feature is Android will never have a fast boot. When you hit the power on the Miyoo it saves the game state and completely powers down. It doesn't go to sleep like Android where the bat is dead a day later. The Miyoo will have power weeks later. And because it boots in 10 seconds right into the middle of the game exactly when you hit power off, it's not a problem to wait for a full boot.
If I needed a painting of a bird, it would be much easier to show the artist a photo of a bird and then describe how my idea differs from the photo instead of spending hours describing to the artist what the bird in my mind should look like.
Bradley didn't like that his boss wasn't standing over his shoulder describing everything while Bradley sketched the picture.
The other artists in the article had valid points.
But Bradley wasn't complaining that they were trying to sell AI. He was upset that his manager used AI to give him a rough estimate of what he wanted Bradley to create.
adjust the end result to accommodate later changes in the requirements.
That's the end result.
AI is particularly bad at both of those.
Bradley wasn't talking about delivering AI art. He didn't like that his manager used AI for prototyping to simplify describing what he wanted Bradley to create.
He wants the manager to describe his ideas to him, then spend hours sketching and inking the idea only for the manager to say, "that's not exactly right" and start it all over again. Bradley must be an hourly contractor because his argument makes no sense. A picture is worth a thousand words. Bradley wants more meetings and email exchanges instead of getting results.
Making a minority party align closer to your views doesn't change that they are a minority party with no power.
The majority voted for Trump. That's the problem that needs to be fixed.
It's like most of the country is driving giant gasoline powered SUV's and you think the solution is making electric cars out of more sustainable materials.
I clicked the picture and it still had a comments "link" but couldn't scroll down to the comments. It was a version of the practical joke where you screen shot someone's desktop and make it the background.
Before Trump announced it publicly. Martha Stewart was jailed for less.