BetaDoggo_ @ BetaDoggo_ @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

284

Joined

2 yr. ago

As someone who has owned a Chromebook for several years, I can tell you that you shouldn't. Hardware wise it's hard to beat Chromebooks at their price points, but the complete lack of control over the system is a deal breaker. I don't have time to list all of the issues I've had. In many cases what would have been trivial fixes on a normal Linux system required full reinstalls on chromeOS. Like the time I accidentally filled up the fairly modest system storage. The system refused to allow me to delete anything, requiring a reset just to get local file management abilities back.

I ultimately ended up installing full Linux on it, which ended up being a whole other ordeal due to all of Google's "security" features.

I'm surprised there isn't something already with how google has been marketing gaming on Chromebooks via streaming services.

It looked too similar to the "Vote" button. Better documentation is definitely needed.

That's basically only OpenAI, maybe some obscure startups as well. Mozzila is far too old and niche to get away with that anyway.

Not necessarily. The same images would be consumed by both groups, there's no need for new data. This is exactly what artists are afraid of. Image generation increases supply dramatically without increasing demand. The amount of data required is also pretty negligible. Maybe a few thousand images.

And what does that have to do with the production of csam? In the example given the data already existed, they've just been more aggressive about collecting it.

Real material is being used to train some models, but sugesting that it will encourage the creation of more "data" is silly. The amount required to finetune a model is tiny compared to the amount that is already known to exist. Just like how regular models haven't driven people to create even more data to train on.

So does any site that quotes the book. Just being trained on a work doesn't give the model the ability to cite it word for word. For most of the books in this set you wouldn't even be able to get a single accurate quote out of most models. The models gain the ability to cite passages from training on other sources citing these same passages.

We don't have the "True Story" creative writing communities.

I thought this was about internal security policy until I remembered that they have a streaming service.

So it's just like regular Quota then.

It's lossless: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.10668.pdf

It could be used to create a reward model like what is done right now with RLHF.

They're a non-profit managed by a for-profit, who's received most of their funding from another for-proft.

Good thing the CEO position doesn't involve work.

I actually ran into this issue just yesterday. Switching my java installation fixed it.

Chatgpt's sampling parameters are unknown, and it definitely doesn't choose the 3rd most likely. More complicated sampling methods are probably used, such as temperature, top p and top k.

Breaking news: children are more gullible than adults.

It's a shame that this game got written of by so many people due to its shaky launch. The game's story and side quests are good and most of the game breaking stuff has been fixed. The visuals and art direction are great so it's nice to see it getting support for new technologies even if no one can run them.

Section 5 of their privacy policy explicitly states that they don't.