Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BE
Posts
0
Comments
235
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • This will come as an absolute shock to you. You can vote for someone you criticize....

    Which party was it that dogpiles on anyone that dares criticize their shitty candidates again?

    The point of saying it before the election is that the expectations are set.

  • Yes. Exactly! The reason people keep bitching about Harris and genocide is because they hope something might actually happen about it.

    Biden was an absolutely terrible candidate (that I was going to vote for) and probably the only person who could lose against Trump. Because people constantly bitched about how bad he was they changed the candidate.

    Harris doesn't get to use Trump as a not-as-bad-as screen, and given that we don't have the option of not voting for her, everyone should be applying every other available form of pressure to discourage her from enabling genocide or otherwise maintaining the status quo.

  • Somehow people think that pointing out that anyone who isn't Trump are pro-genocide means that Trump somehow isn't pro-genocide.

    Like you're not allowed to think about two problems at once. Or that there are no other options....

  • Chat censoring should be mostly on the user side with user controlled blacklists and whitelists, with moderator involvement mostly for circumventing the filters.

    Don't want to see "penis"? Put it on your own blacklist.

  • People can be deathly allergic to peanuts, legume or not, and that tends to coincide with allergies to nuts.

    There are regulations that say foods that may have nuts must be labelled that way because of that.

    There's no reason for the regulations to add clauses like "unless the name of the product has 'nut' in it" because it's just simpler for everyone to be consistent and put the same label on everything, no matter how "obvious" people who won't have to go to the hospital if they eat the wrong thing think the name is.

  • Because their plan at the time was to allow (or assist) him to be propped up under the belief Clinton would then be a shoo-in. Which is a completely moronic strategy because if you lose you're absolutely fucked.

    They probably never want to actually keep him from being a candidate because it means their candidates just need to meet the barest of minimums to be viable.