Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BE
Posts
0
Comments
235
Joined
1 yr. ago

Square!

Jump
  • I couldn't find any definition of geometric shape that uses that criterion, including Wikipedia which also has a 5-pointed star shown with 5 line segments labelled as a shape: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape.

    The meme is wrong because squares are polygons by definition, which by definition are made of line segments, but this thing has curved sections.

  • Some Bernie people even went to Trump for the "drain the swamp" lie.

    It doesn't help that the Clinton campaign intentionally lent credence to Trump thinking he'd be a slam dunk compared to any of the half-sane Republicans in the primaries.

  • Basically. They're ambush hunters that pop up and snatch/vacuum prey into their maws. I recall the tassels are also attractive to fish that look for food in the sand, but don't quote me on that.

    https://youtu.be/mbv2DhcKAh4?si=HbeUT1T-3haR9DOX

    Least annoying video I could find in a few seconds.

  • Better solution.

    Data are owned by the generator. Only they can sell it etc...

    This also solves the privacy problem of law enforcement agencies applying warrants to phone companies etc. for access to your data, which has been an end-run around 4th Amendment rights for decades.

  • By "recovered" the cops unironically mean the opposite of recovered - as in a non-police person has taken the knife.

    I can't tell from just this article if I should lean more to standard cop butchering of language or intentional deception.

    EDIT: Or not? I found another article that says they retracted that statement about recovering the knife - that it was the wrong knife. That definitely doesn't make me less suspicious...

  • Someone fucked these up badly and there's no way to tell from this how.

    Are the numbers swapped between candidates but the sizes correct? Are the sizes swapped between candidates and the numbers correct?

    As an aside, this is why serious data people don't use pie charts. They're terrible for lots of reasons, one being it's very hard to compare areas instead of lengths, like a bar chart, as demonstrated by how many people didn't notice these were so bad at first.

    If you see data presented in a pie chart you should immediately be suspicious that it's dishonest or incompetent.

    None of that is to take away that voting for third parties this election is a terrible move - just saying this chart is useless.