The fuck is going on here? My wife and daughter don't break kitkats and are rightly considered heathens, but at least they're sufficiently civilised to eat from one end. Fucking abomination.
Risc v is an instruction set architecture not a chip design, the actual hardware implementation of any given risc v processor won't necessarily be open source and available to all, it's just a guarantee that if the spec is implemented then code compiled for risc v will run on a RISC V processor.
China has had access to x86 for years, they've not been able to implement a chip on par with current gen AMD or Intel chips.
Genuinely curious, is it just as a side effect of appearing to come from an EU server that means you trigger automated privacy systems? Or is there a legal basis by which you can say "I routed this through an EU server therefore I'm subject to EU privacy law" (maybe there isn't even a difference)
I've no real preference so long as my PC starts stuff. The reason I avoid flatpaks is because I have at some point acquired the habit of anything I install that's not an appimage I pretty much launch from the terminal and I remember trying flatpaks and them having names like package.package.nameofapp-somethingelse and I can't keep that in my head.
Doesn't the appellate court only accept the case if there's an issue with the ruling in a lower court? It's absolutely loaded, but it's hard to see an alternative without giving up the right to appeal.
That's like an espresso cup, right? I only know metric.