Baaahb @ Baaahb @feddit.nl

Posts

0

Comments

104

Joined

11 mo. ago

You have to get permission to sue the us from the us.

Susan Alexandra "Sigourney" Weaver (/sɪˈɡɔːrni/ si-GOR-nee; born October 8, 1949) is an American actress. Prolific in film since the late 1970s, she is known for her pioneering portrayals of action heroines in blockbusters and for her various roles in independent films.[3][4][5]

Neither has sigourney weaver, seeing as her name is Susan. Wikipedia says she took it frk. The great Gatsby at 14

Flowering plants use life to spread genetics. No reason to be carnivorous if there's no reason for animals to crawl all over you

I mean, well, some would.

That sounds like a "councilor" and not a therapist. A therapist has qualifications.

Isreal just saved her life from isreal?

Honestly I'm 50/50 on getting my prime shit on time.

I'm not misunderstanding you, you are misunderstanding op. the official definition was rejected. I didn't come up with that dumb shit, their opponent did. I'm merely stating that denying that its genocide based on any definition available is fkn stupid, regardless of if its legalistic or layman.

None of that has been mentioned by op, beyond "here is the actual definition of genocide." op pointed to the amnesty international definition, and was refused by his opponent. so defaulting to the dictionary.... Isreal is exterminating an ethnic group intentionally.... Its fkn genocide.

What are you on about? Either we go by the legal definition of genocide, which isreal clearly meets, or we go by the dictionary definition of genocide that isreal clearly meets... What point do you think you are making?

Are you saying it can't be genocide cause that must be proven in a court of law? That is asinine.

Details like what? Exterminating an ethnic group, either by murder, displacement or cultural eradication, genocide is genocide.

Two questions: Is isreal committing genocide? Is this person denying that?

If a is yes and b is yes, it sounds like this person is denying a genocide.

Honest question, what part of the dictionary definition suggests that this isnt genocide?

Either you're a shill, a turfer, or a moron, or maybe you have legit said something stupid and dont understand why.

I dont know where you are from, or what culture you are but, what would you propose to do to indicate that something is unacceptable, after having stated that many many times, and the people who have traditionally murdered your people for being "savages"opt to ignore you many times, and are the people that hold power? Just say "this is unacceptable" and take the loss, while just allowing your constituents to get fucked?

Good on you for refusing the test. Bad on you for being an utter twat.

Call me buddy, friend.

Wasn't talking to you directly, but appending additional info to what you were saying. You kinda did suggest that taking gabapentin would help with their pain, so while Yes, its a terrible idea to take prescription stuff without knowing what you are doing, if they are gonna read what you told them and decide to ignore the part where you suggest you are uncomfortable providing medical advice and then go ahead and do it anyway, they should at least be warned that your advice is particularly dangerous due to gabapentins mental side effects.

Because what you are working on is USEFUL. Gtfo. Create cause you love it not cause its a job. We have those and usually dont want an additional one.

Gabapenten has serious side effects, dont just go get some and go "o we gonna be good."

Yes, but...

So the most basic way orbits work, the faster you go, the higher your orbit. Any collision has to conserve momentum, so any collision will be a net deceleration.

There WILL be things that get ejected at higher velocity, but most would cause the orbit to decay instead.

Also, while there are thousands of satellites up there, they really aren't very close to one another.

You'd need to put a LOT of really small pieces of debris, like a shuttle exploding, to cause them to spread over LEO to a point where the random collisions really out things under threat.

Like a train crash. You can't look away, and if the only co sequences were that musk and bezos lost money, looked stupid, and everyone else got a pretty fireworks show, it WOULD be amazing. Additional consequences do put a damper on that though.