Arkouda @ Arkouda @lemmy.ca

Why are you here weirdo?

---

Read more

Posts

28

Comments

1,537

Joined

1 yr. ago

I am not going to argue with you about it. This was resolved almost a month ago.

Read the original equation again, plug some numbers into it, and try again. If that doesn't help, read the rest of the thread. If you still don't get it I cannot help you.

Capitalists advocate against Government intervention in the markets. To a capitalist the only laws that should exist are those that protect people, property, and assets allowing for free and open trade amongst individuals and corporations.

Your inexperience and own beliefs do not make the experiences of those talking to you invalid; furthermore, calling other people’s experiences rhetoric and belief is frankly rude.

Saying "the latinos vote against immigration", "the poor vote against social services", and assuming all groups are out for themselves is bigotry.

Your constant personal attacks and bad faith arguing is what is rude, and assuming I have never "hung out with enough minorities to think right" is another huge helping of bigotry from you.

That said, I'm out.

fascism is cheapest way to get to a monopoly.

Tell that to communism.

Thank you for demonstrating your lack of good faith early.

Capitalism is an Economic structure, Fascism is a Political ideology. Fascism does not benefit a Capitalist because it imposes heavy regulation on the free market to benefit themselves which is anti Capitalist.

With that as the definition I would say Boolean Algebra.

So that’s kind of the Yugoslavia solution, right? I’d agree, that would do the trick, but I’d like to point out there’s still pockets of Serbians that think what they did was cool. Putting the onus on one side of the current conflict - and the far less powerful side - to smarten up beforehand seems unfair. That’s how your initial comment read.

In a sense it is similar, I am not as familiar with that situation. That is always a major issue after extended ethnic conflicts unfortunately. I can see how my initial comment could be interpreted that way only when taken out of the context of the conversation "There is issues on the Palestinian side of the conflict that need to be resolved for lasting peace".

I’m actually pretty hopeful about the feasibility of ending the cycle. Human history is full of ethnic conflicts, and especially recent human history is full of the sides maintaining an uneasy peace afterwards. People might hate, but they want to live in safety far more; this specific conflict is still ongoing because one side has been empowered to do both.

I am hopeful as well, especially considering the history of conflicts like these maintaining that uneasy peace you brought up. Hopefully the greater international community will step in and do what needs to be done before it is too late to resolve the situation.

Capitalists lose under both Socialism and Fascism. Neither Political structure benefits a pure Capitalist because both systems impose heavy regulation on the free market which is anti Capitalist.

Capitalism and Fascism do not work together. Capitalism and Socialism do not work together.

The prior because Fascists impose heavy regulation on the markets to benefit themselves, and the latter because Socialism is a Socioeconomic ideology which replaces the need for Capitalism within it.

I suspect you’ve never hung out with enough different minority groups to understand the scope of difficulty. I mean FFS the Latinos vote against immigration, The poor vote against social services. Even when you run into a minority group that is doing things in their best interest, they’re not inclined to stick their neck out for people outside there subgroup. Nobody else is taking care of them so they take care of themselves and they give no F’s about the other minorities

You should reflect on why your rhetoric and beliefs are a major part of the problem.

Thank you for caring about a metric that doesn't matter for me. Do you worry about everyone's down votes or just the pretty ones like me?

The brackets are used to make the equation look cleaner, and the issue for declaring the statement true was doing Addition and Subtraction in the wrong order.

A - ( B x C ) + ( D x E ) = A - ( B x C ) - ( D x E )

Using your example:

10 - 1 + 1 = 10 doing the subtraction first. 10 - 1 + 1 = 8 doing the addition first.

When doing the other side of the equation:

10 - 1 - 1 = 8 regardless of order because it is all subtraction. edit: Brain still waking up it is not the same regardless of order, but you do it left to right making it incorrect to do 1-1 first.

By doing it out of order and incorrectly I was able to make my statement true that as long as A was greater than the sum of B-E both sides would be equal.

Capitalists don't really benefit under Fascism, so I don't see why a true Capitalist would support a fascist and help them gain power.

Because the companies and ultra rich contribute financially to fascists to take away our rights, and drive wedges between people. What are you talking about if not oligarchy and fascism? Like, some kind of softball league?

I am talking about all minority groups without basic human rights working together to achieve rights for all of them as a singular unit. Which I made very clear in the OP.

If you want to start a fight with someone, go elsewhere.

This was about rights, not agreeing on every single subject. For minority groups without, or lacking in, basic human rights in the same population it is more productive to try and attain them as a singular group.

Everything you have said is a moot point in regards to what I am saying.

This assumes the minority groups can all agree on things in order to “come together.”

Do you know what a moot point is?

This doesn't really change, or add, to my point does it?

I made my points and you are choosing to not respond to them or understand them. Try asking good faith questions, and stop trying for bad faith tactics.

Not everything is about fascists.

Does that change my point?