Who would answer anything but "chop em all off"? Lol. You can singlehandedly stop world hunger, and you don't even have to give your life for it, just your fingers? A lot of praiseworthy people have given way more for way less. It's a small sacrifice for the betterment of the world, I wouldn't trust any man whose immediate instinct isn't to sacrifice their fingers...
What are the odds of being so odd? Even if it's concerning negative characteristics, I think it's a bit arrogant, for lack of a better word, to think yourself so special.
I did when I was in the army, and the moment I was in the clear I went back to my vice, lol. But not for any other job (I needed the army for papers!), fuck that. I don't live in the US though so I should be good. 🙏
Back when I was a kid in HS I used to party a lot throughout the week (abusive household + somewhat lawless country) and sometimes I went clubbing still with my school uniform on and at least a couple of times I approached groups of visibly older women. Rejected both times but I'd like to believe my arrogance/confidence, which has helped me countless times, should be praised, lol.
Often. I just say something like "okay, you might be right/you're entirely right, my bad and thank you". I like to ask and answer all sorts of things, this happens somewhat often, lol.
If they were in a 'concentration camp' they would be more chill about non-deadly things, so no. I've only gotten banned from hexbear for wild reasons, apparently the mods in here are more reasonable.
The last two might make sense, the others don't. But regardless, what is boring to one might not be to others. Some watch movies for visual spectacle and beautiful shots, others for deep, well written stories and sentimentality, strong emotion well portrayed, for instance. Preference is not necessarily an objective measure of quality, is what I'm saying, and that's okay. That's why you find some critic that watches movies for the same reasons and then try not to miss the movies he also enjoyed...
You can be educated and hardworking and be a morally reprehensible human being that will absolutely burn in Hell (Henry Kissinger, for example). No, the people need some sort of shared moral ground, something axiomatic, so they police themselves and don't cannibalize each other. Amorality (because moral relativists don't believe in acts being ultimately, undeniably immoral) is the problem.
No, friend, those people are forged by life, not bred. But if we all had a higher floor (ideologically - ethically), some of us could reach higher ceilings.
Autocracy is convenient when the leader is wise and just. Sadly, even if we found one, they're not genetic traits. Democracy is convenient in any other case, but it's harder to properly implement compared to autocracy.
Those are your only "leftist" ideas? 😅 But no, if it's still uncertain, it bears examination until it's not anymore, one way or another, and that goes for every idea.
Who would answer anything but "chop em all off"? Lol. You can singlehandedly stop world hunger, and you don't even have to give your life for it, just your fingers? A lot of praiseworthy people have given way more for way less. It's a small sacrifice for the betterment of the world, I wouldn't trust any man whose immediate instinct isn't to sacrifice their fingers...