Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AR
Posts
1
Comments
568
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It works AMAZING on the giant 12 inch iPad Pro (saw a friend use it)

    But if you have good enough eyesight and the Magic Keyboard, it’s great for using your iPad as a laptop replacement for “in office” days.

    You have to make the text and everything as small as possible, so that you can actually see things in the app that’s live, and I wish you could shrink the spacing on it….

    But it allows you to properly multitask for meetings between notes, Jira, slack etc…

  • You’re both right.

    Greed and psychopathy will float to the top of every system, because the greediest and most psychopathic will inevitably see the system as a game to be won.

    Ideally we shun it, but the “useful psychopath” is helpful to our own greed.

    If only we could prevent it, but I don’t have that answer.

  • Sure, but in 10 years, someone will be able to tell ai “make me a movie about cowboys where x happens” and it’ll make a script. And we’ll be able to ask ai to make a cgi scene where x happens.

    It will drastically shrink the workforce required to do it.

  • Very soon is still 10 years out, but you aren’t wrong.

    Ironically this will level the playing field for truly good and creative writing, but will also generate a fuck ton of “crap”

    It’s gonna be an interesting ride.

  • While I’m not arguing your point, it certainly appears you’re right…..

    I just can’t help but feel like the original story (despite the inaccuracy) was on to something.

    A few years ago when Google stopped processing quotes in the search properly, their search engine started shitting the bed HARD.

    I’ve always felt that since that time they’ve been searching the wrong things. Search has gotten worse. It’s been better for finding items I want to buy, but complete dogshit for everything else. I don’t particularly buy that seo’s got a sudden unexplained boost at that time.

    I don’t know, the article (despite the inaccuracies) really felt like it explained everything nicely. So the article might be wrong but…. There’s still something there Google isn’t telling us. I kinda wonder if it’s true despite the lack of evidence.