You have the correct answer, echoed by others. If one could draw a sharp line, then we would see proto-chickens laying eggs containing chickens and then some of those chickens laying eggs containing proto-chickens, back and forth for many generations. The combination of alleles that qualifies an organism as a chicken would arise and then often be reversed by recombination in the next generation. Eventually as more and more of the population has chicken allele combinations, the percentage of chickens born would grow as the reversals became less numerous than the forward conversions.
Now, what defines whether an egg is a proto-chicken egg or a chicken egg? An egg is formed by the action of maternal genes, so it will have the characteristics given to it by the proto-chicken mother. But if you just define an egg that hatches a chicken as a chicken egg (rather than an egg laid by a chicken), the egg always comes first.
Instead of adding the AI edit, you should remove the post until the legitimacy of what is reported is confirmed. Misinformation that delights us is still misinformation.
I think its knot just you understand but how quicker it is to get demeaning it is also important. The more pour spells and grammer makes you to backup and red again, even if you can finally deciver it, the wurst it is.
At some point you give up, but well before that you have every right to be annoyed.
Some answers are becoming available. Bus crash did involve children but was considered minor. Giuffre went home before going to the hospital. Apparently she felt alright at first but then started having issues. The police did not go to the scene or I'm sure they would have insisted she gets treatment based on the bruises.
If the driver was a hired assassin, he did a shitty job and just got lucky, apparently. I'm thinking for now that scenario is incredibly unlikely.
Yeah. I realize that landmines have terrible consequences in times of peace. I also realize the Finns don't want to lose territory to Russia (again). It just seems hypocritical to me to be against something when you have no use for it and then do an about face.
So, when we don't need anti-personnel landmines, then they are bad, and other nations should not use them. When we do need them, their use becomes acceptable.
You have the correct answer, echoed by others. If one could draw a sharp line, then we would see proto-chickens laying eggs containing chickens and then some of those chickens laying eggs containing proto-chickens, back and forth for many generations. The combination of alleles that qualifies an organism as a chicken would arise and then often be reversed by recombination in the next generation. Eventually as more and more of the population has chicken allele combinations, the percentage of chickens born would grow as the reversals became less numerous than the forward conversions.
Now, what defines whether an egg is a proto-chicken egg or a chicken egg? An egg is formed by the action of maternal genes, so it will have the characteristics given to it by the proto-chicken mother. But if you just define an egg that hatches a chicken as a chicken egg (rather than an egg laid by a chicken), the egg always comes first.