5BC2E7 @ 5BC2E7 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

372

Joined

2 yr. ago

It’s fine if you disagree. That counterpoint was refuted already.

I already made it clear on my answer but I'm not surprised you missed it. it's pretty disingenuous to ask something like that and disrespectful for those who had to suffer it. it's well documented so if you want to know you just need to stop covering your ears.

I think that’s the type of reasoning that leads to communism and famines. Politicians are known to steal agenda items from the other side. I think it’s really stupid to oppose good measures just because they are not coming from your tribe.

Either you don’t have good reading comprehension or you are trolling. To spell it out for in case you are really challenged crimes are already ilegal by definition and yet that doesn’t make society free from crime. In other words your assumption of this working is delusional

The context is multicultural international relations. While it’s not impossible to have a good understanding of other cultures without learning their languages and reading relevant literature in the original language rather than a translation it’s highly unlikely.

Context is important. Consider the context and re read the comments.

what about banning crimes? wouldn't making crimes illegal solve all our problems?

So they can decide what’s good for your body except for abortions? It’s incredible how people values are so fluid. They might as well say that everything the right does is evil and wrong.

It seems to me that not being able to speak other languages tells you something about the level of education and breadth of knowledge of a person or at least about their open mindedness or lack of thereof.

Don’t forget to declare any stuff that might get trapped on your shoes. Iirc people have been jailed for having “marijuana traces” on them.

EDIT: not sure why people are voting down but this actually happened: https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18842015

I hope they put some failsafe so that it cannot take action if the estimated casualties puts humans below a minimum viable population.

disgusting. it doesn't surprise me. publishers are continously testing how much their customers can bend over.

why limit yourself when you can get a paycheck and enjoy your job at the same time? consider how many hours of your life you spend at work.

I hope they don't come up with a superlight suv to defeat this. mostly because it would likely turn over easily.

Absolutely. ignoring the issue is not going to help. not sure how we can pressure "city designers" (no clue how it actually works) to effect the change.

I think it's likely a nation state. the gay furry claim is just a distraction.

Can you even afford a car? I somehow doubt it. you have that typical attitude of wanting to ban the things that are outside your reach.

If their values are incompatible and they are inflexible they made a mistake and should relocate.

Have you ever considered that they don’t have to suffer the consequences of the terrorist actions.

well now this is getting interesting beyond gossip. I doubt they made a significant AGI-related breakthrough but it might be something really cool and useful.