5BC2E7 @ 5BC2E7 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

372

Joined

2 yr. ago

And you even have some vr fans just blindly claiming that all games should use gliding for movement and that having the option to teleport ruins the game even if they don’t use it. even though gliding (they call it natural locomotion) makes people sick because it’s obviously unnatural. They claim there is no need for movement systems that don’t induce motion sickness because it’s a matter of getting used to “natural locomotion” an anyone who doesn’t get better is because they are lying🙄.

Alexa is more like a telemarketer disguised as an assistant. Every interaction is followed by a “by the way . Its a shit experience so I stopped using mine.

I am paying close attention to their charges. I am sure that at some point the discounts will not be worth the fees.

I am not defending them but they seem to be making a distinction between cattle and pets

I could be wrong. but since I really didn't intend to appear angry, and i was not angry I am not reading that in the comment. perhaps it's the accusation of facism that riles people up. which was precisely my point. and if we are talking about my emotions. in truth i feel mostly sad because the people that are making this comments have strong opinons on the issue and care enough to try to make things better.

A tankie instance

I think using that term is fully regressing to tribalism. I believe that in some cases we can reach the goal by building consensus with the opposition. I'm sure we can see the world with more than 1 bit of resolution.

this seems a bit more complicated than the examples you share where things are more evident. even if they are wrong, they can be wrong for reasons other than them being facists.

edit: to show some nuance, would people not be against open software that is purposefully crafted for a nefarious purpose? be it ransomware, or software for a DIY automated blinding laser weapons? I know UN would probably not like the second example, regardless of it being FOSS.

the thing is that you don't want to become the thing you are fighting. you can be right in every case, as long as it's in a case by case basis. it would be different if you explain why the arguments are bad faith arguments or why they are facists, that is also perfectly fine.

You might be able to assert they are full of shit after hearing the arguments. Accusing them of being fascist for not agreeing with you is extremely intolerant and authoritarian aka facist.

Are they forming a technology union? Otherwise I think this should be in news.

It applies to morally sound people as well as in law.

I think they should copy uk and make a deal with another less popular but safe country to relocate them. It seems to be working for uk.

Yes. absolutely.

I am not sure what is your point. It’s clear to me and It might be clear to you, but you should look at the comments and realize that a few people struggle to accept that its not a hoax.

Yes but you have to consider how long the government has made a mockery of the topic. Public opinion is still struggling with accepting that the ufos/uaps are actually real. Once they accept that they might start thinking about what it might be.

It’s not “my term” you can find the meaning of real in the dictionary.

It was a childish joke about him conflating a violation of his rights with “stealing his voice”.

He can’t do much as an actor without a voice.

your comment basically confirms you did not read my previous comment where i shared an example that nasa disclosed with a link. there is even a non blurry video of one...