Mike Johnson’s Wife Takes Down Website That Compared Being Gay To Bestiality, Incest
Mike Johnson’s Wife Takes Down Website That Compared Being Gay To Bestiality, Incest
Conservatives always link bestiality and homosexuality, because they see gay people as no more than animals, subhuman. So of course a subhuman would just fuck everything else subhuman, so they make that fucked up link that having sex with another consenting adult, somehow means you're gearing up to fuck animals.
They or his wife wants to fuck dogs and is projecting.
I never considered that aspect of it, horrible. Bad enough equivocating people that do those things with someone's preference. 'Subhuman' is beyond. I just can't understand caring that much who someone else loves let alone hating for it.
The Internet never forgets.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230330184244/https://www.onwardchristiancounseling.org/
This is how you funnel money to people in government positions. Their spouses give "talks" across a "wide variety of timely topics" for money.
I read the title and thought “wow that’s unexpectedly cool of her to proactively go after terrible homophobic websites and get them taken down somehow…“. Then I read a little bit more and realized it was HER website. Of course.
THANK YOU for explaining!!! I didn't read the article (heh) and I was like, "what the hell is with all these comments? Who are these people???"
TL;DR; I'll just fill in the punchline from all of the previous, similar news articles: Mike Johnson and his wife are self-loathing sexual deviants. Got it.
Like simultaneously pro-life AND pro-NRA?
😉
"Wide Stance" is a reference to the long-time R senator from Idaho who was busted by a detective at the Minneapolis airport while apparently looking to have anonymous gay sex in a restroom. It seems the way guys would signal their interest to each other was by playing footsie between the stalls, and Craig's excuse was he is a 'wide guy' which somehow turned into 'wide stance'.
Also, check out the recipe he submitted to the Congress Cooks! cook book (which was really hilariously horrible, btw, it's gone now but used to be on a site called virtualcities):
https://dinnerisserved1972.com/2012/10/03/wiener-wednesday-super-tuber/
The Super Tuber. Most homoerotic entree I have ever imagined... you are supposed to take a potato, cut a hole through it, grease it up, then shove a hot dog through the middle.
No like "just asking for some tp" under a stall divider.
Heads don't fall that easily.
If you're going to be homo- or transphobic (por qué no los dos?) I way you need to own that shit. This conservative whitewashing of their closely held beliefs when the light suddenly shines on them is doubly disgusting.
I believe that's part of the Republican mantra though. Say a bunch of awful things, then immediately deny that you said it. To what effect, I have no clue.
They’re testing the fences. This is how fascism creeps in mostly under the radar.
They say something egregious and gauge the response. If it gets too much backlash, they dial it back a bit, but each outrageous move normalises fascism a bit more until people are unknowingly accepting things that would have been unthinkable a few years before.
By the time people notice, discourse is so broken it’s nearly impossible to go back without seismic (and often deadly) social change.
They made the point to the people they wanted to (could it be one of their favorite accusations ....virtue signaling?) and then claim they removed it because they're being persecuted by WOKEys and the Bad Liberal Media.
Idiots with either opinion will flock to you to be contrarians.
Somebody's hiding their light under a bushel!
Oh no!
Where do you buy these nonflammable bushels
Right next to the bushes that burn but are not consumed; aisle 35B, third shelf.
Being gay is nothing like those two. Glad it is gone.
If she actually believed her own bullshit then she would be GLAD that she has a more prominent platform from which to spread her beliefs.
Seriously. Deeply held religions convictions my ass.
Next up: Conservatives call Mike Johnson a groomer for his wife taking down site comparing homosexuality to bestiality, incest
Christians are animals lmao.
Favorably?
Why does this guy look like someone asked an AI to create a real life Alfred E. Neuman with glasses? It's uncanny.
Log Cabin Republican approved!
well at least she took it down
edit: i was being ineffably sarcastic
This is arguably a bad thing. The damage her shitty website could do is nothing compared to the damage that her husband can do if they're successful in whitewashing his history. They haven't stopped believing these things, they just don't want the public to know they believe these things.
Oh Poe's Law...
"Intersex people don't exist. Stop making up words. If a baby has multiple sex charistics then OF COURSE surgical intervention is needed to force a binary choice. God doesn't make mistakes, but sometimes he does a whoopsie."
These people refuse to understand human biology because their goddamn Bible has already told them everything they want to know. Yet they have the gall to laughingly repeat "iT's bAsiC BiolOgY" without a clue to their ignorance.
I'm pretty sure they haven't even read the Bible at this point.
Reading and comprehension are two different things. They have likely read the bible. If they believe in hell and quote Leviticus as though it represents Christian law then they have failed to comprend it.
They think this sounds quippy like they're in a sitcom, whereas really they sound like an under-educated five year old
God doesn't shit, but sometimes he does a poo poo.
I want so badly what they mean by woopsie. Like....if God is capable of an woopsie, then he is not infallible.
So....is he God or not?
I can't tell if that intersex quote is real or not.
The crazy has become so normal i can't be sure.
I actually doubt the Bible goes into gender identity. It’s all pure bigotry.
It doesn't but Jesus does he's pretty clear he says
'be fuckin nice to people you shit heads"
i may be paraphrasing but that is what he's trying to get across
I don't remember it being prominent but there are a shitload of bizarre rules.
If they are going to believe in a god but then deny, abuse and destroy nature, which could only be thought of as their god's expression in physical form, doesn't that make these people blasphemous heretics by their own definition? Unfortunately, these "religious" fucks are just liars who in reality think they know better than whatever god they act like they believe in. They'll abuse and destroy anything in their path because to them noone and nothing has actual value. The only important thing to them is their own imagined version of the divine.
People seem to think religious people do things because their religion demands them. That is not how this works.
Their id demands it. Their ego demands it. Then in the cold light of morning. They had to do it. For God.