4mo ago

Roberts rejects Trump's call for impeaching judge who ruled against his deportation plans

apnews.com

11 comments

Hey Roberts, I hope you're finally realizing that your boneheaded decision to give this guy immunity means you signed up to get knocked down. So let's see what you've got now, you ignoramus.
- That ruling did say the courts decide what is an official duty, at least.
  
  How's that "Rule of Law" working out for us?
  
  Yeah, they think they, and the broader Federalist movement, can command the beast, so no one else should have any controls over it.
Wow, I hope Trump doesn't try to make a judicial reform for the election of judges because that would already be a sign of dictatorship.
- Judges are already elected in many areas of the US, but for Federal judges, yeah, that would be a bad thing.
Schumer once they impeach ACB, "We need to replace her, and it's not an election year. Only having 8 judges would be far worse than having another psychopathic nazi. For these reasons I approve of Jenny Thomas for SCOTUS."
- You don't have to make up situations that haven't happened to hate on someone. Just hate on what they've actually done.
Too little, too late
I don't see how people are seeing that Roberts statement as a rejection of Trump. He didn't say Trump's name or call out anything specific Trump's done and he's demonstrated that he's perfectly capable of doing that
Roberts then issued a rare public rebuke, according to Fox News.
“This morning, Senator Schumer spoke at a rally in front of the Supreme Court while a case was being argued inside. Senator Schumer referred to two Members of the Court by name and said he wanted to tell them that ‘You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You will not know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions,'” the statement said
“Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort [blah blah blah]
Archived

11 comments